[LTP] [RFC PATCH 1/1] lib: Print in summary also tests not run at all

[Petr Vorel]

> On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 8:53 PM Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz> wrote:

> > Hi Li, Xu,

> > > > In fact, we don't have mandatory rules that TAPSS or TFAIL only can
> > > > occur one time. a example ie memcontrol02.c

> > > Right, that is my hesitant part for counting that.
> > > Seems many tests abuse the TPASS|TFAIL for defining test fail bound.

> > OK, while it'd be useful for some tests, it'd be confusing due this for
> > other.
> > I guess printing (tst_test->tcnt * test_variants) number can be confusing
> > either.


> Agree, so we might need more time coming up with a better solution.
> Or, we go another way to limit the abuse in TPASS|TFAIL in the test.

> But both sound not easy at this moment.
Given number of the tests we have (and how many of them we need to rewrite)
it'd be hard (and probably not worth of doing it).

Kind regards,
Petr