[LTP] [PATCH v2 4/4] sysctl/sysctl02.sh: Use kconfig shell api

[Cyril Hrubis]

Hi!
> @@ -20,15 +20,14 @@ TST_CLEANUP=cleanup
>  TST_CNT=4
>  TST_NEEDS_ROOT=1
>  TST_NEEDS_CMDS="sysctl"
> +TST_NEEDS_KCONFIGS="CONFIG_SYSCTL=y, CONFIG_PROC_FS=y"

Is there a good reason to check for PROC_FS? I doubt that modern system
without CONFIG_PROC_FS will even boot.

>  sys_name="fs.file-max"
>  sys_file="/proc/sys/fs/file-max"
> -syms_file="/proc/kallsyms"
>  
>  . tst_test.sh
>  
>  setup()
>  {
> -	[ ! -f "$sys_file" ] && tst_brk TCONF "$sys_file not enabled"
>  	orig_value=$(cat "$sys_file")
>  }
>  
> @@ -61,17 +60,15 @@ sysctl_test_overflow()
>  
>  sysctl_test_zero()
>  {
> -	[ ! -f "$syms_file" ] && tst_brk TCONF "$syms_file not enabled"
> +	tst_check_kconfigs "CONFIG_KALLSYMS=y" "CONFIG_KALLSYMS_ALL=y" "CONFIG_KASAN=y" \
> +		|| tst_brk TCONF "kconfig doesn't meet test's requirement!"
> +
>  	ROD sysctl -w -q $sys_name=0
>  
> -	if grep -q kasan_report $syms_file; then
> -		if dmesg | grep -q "KASAN: global-out-of-bounds in __do_proc_doulongvec_minmax"; then
> -			tst_res TFAIL "$sys_file is set 0 and trigger a KASAN error"
> -		else
> -			tst_res TPASS "$sys_file is set 0 and doesn't trigger a KASAN error"
> -		fi
> +	if dmesg | grep -q "KASAN: global-out-of-bounds in __do_proc_doulongvec_minmax"; then
> +		tst_res TFAIL "$sys_file is set 0 and trigger a KASAN error"
>  	else
> -		tst_res TCONF "kernel doesn't support KASAN"
> +		tst_res TPASS "$sys_file is set 0 and doesn't trigger a KASAN error"
>  	fi
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.23.0
> 
> 
> -- 
> Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz