[LTP] [PATCH] rpc_lib.sh: fix portmapper detection in case of socket activation
Petr Vorel
pvorel@suse.cz
Thu Jan 20 22:01:38 CET 2022
Hi Nikita,
[ Cc: Steve as user-space maintainer, also Neil and whole linux-nfs ]
> On systemd-based linux hosts, rpcbind service is typically started via
> socket activation, when the first client connects. If no client has
> connected before LTP rpc test starts, rpcbind process will not be
> running at the time of check_portmap_rpcbind() execution, causing
> check_portmap_rpcbind() to report TCONF error.
> Fix that by adding a quiet invocation of 'rpcinfo' before checking for
> rpcbind.
Looks reasonable, but I'd prefer to have confirmation from NFS experts.
> For portmap, similar step is likely not needed, because portmap is used
> only on old systemd and those don't use systemd.
> Signed-off-by: Nikita Yushchenko <nikita.yushchenko@virtuozzo.com>
> ---
> testcases/network/rpc/basic_tests/rpc_lib.sh | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> diff --git a/testcases/network/rpc/basic_tests/rpc_lib.sh b/testcases/network/rpc/basic_tests/rpc_lib.sh
> index c7c868709..e882e41b3 100644
> --- a/testcases/network/rpc/basic_tests/rpc_lib.sh
> +++ b/testcases/network/rpc/basic_tests/rpc_lib.sh
> @@ -8,6 +8,12 @@ check_portmap_rpcbind()
> if pgrep portmap > /dev/null; then
> PORTMAPPER="portmap"
> else
> + # In case of systemd socket activation, rpcbind could be
> + # not started until somebody tries to connect to it's socket.
> + #
> + # To handle that case properly, run a client now.
> + rpcinfo >/dev/null 2>&1
nit: Shouldn't we keep stderr? In LTP we put required commands into
$TST_NEEDS_CMDS. It'd be better not require rpcinfo (not a hard dependency),
and thus it'd be better to see "command not found" when rpcinfo missing and test
fails.
Kind regards,
Petr
> +
> pgrep rpcbind > /dev/null && PORTMAPPER="rpcbind" || \
> tst_brk TCONF "portmap or rpcbind is not running"
> fi
More information about the ltp
mailing list