Hi Avinesh, Xu, > Hi Avinesh > I did't look this cleanup patch, but I see the old code is same as > dup202.c(This case covers more situation, ie using chmod). Maybe we can > just add a test_variant to use dup syscall in dup202.c? > Then remove this case directly. +1, yes, the code in both tests indeed does the same. Kind regards, Petr