[LTP] [PATCH 4/7] openposix: sem_timedwait/11-1: Fix

[Cyril Hrubis]

Actually run both of the cases (valid timeout and invalid timeout).

The timeout is not actually invalid, but rather in the past, which is
important to test as the system has to try to lock the semaphore first
and only if that fails it should check the timeout.

Signed-off-by: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
---
 .../conformance/interfaces/sem_timedwait/11-1.c          | 9 +++++----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/sem_timedwait/11-1.c b/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/sem_timedwait/11-1.c
index f87afaa43..663edd836 100644
--- a/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/sem_timedwait/11-1.c
+++ b/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/sem_timedwait/11-1.c
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
 #include "posixtest.h"
 
 #define TIMEOUT 2
-#define INVALIDTIMEOUT -2
+#define NEGATIVETIMEOUT -2
 #define TEST "11-1"
 #define FUNCTION "sem_timedwait"
 #define ERROR_PREFIX "unexpected error: " FUNCTION " " TEST ": "
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ int main(void)
 			ts[i].tv_sec = time(NULL) + TIMEOUT;
 			ts[i].tv_nsec = 0;
 		} else if (i == 1) {
-			ts[i].tv_sec = time(NULL) + INVALIDTIMEOUT;
+			ts[i].tv_sec = time(NULL) + NEGATIVETIMEOUT;
 			ts[i].tv_nsec = 0;
 		}
 		/* Lock Semaphore */
@@ -63,13 +63,14 @@ int main(void)
 
 		/* Checking if the value of the Semaphore decremented by one */
 		if ((val[i] == 0) && (sts[i] == 0)) {
-			puts("TEST PASSED");
 			sem_destroy(&mysemp[i]);
-			return PTS_PASS;
 		} else {
 			puts("TEST FAILED");
 			sem_destroy(&mysemp[i]);
 			return PTS_FAIL;
 		}
 	}
+
+	puts("TEST PASSED");
+	return PTS_PASS;
 }
-- 
2.35.1