[LTP] [PATCH 2/7] mem/lib: Export group_check() as ksm_group_check()
Richard Palethorpe
rpalethorpe@suse.de
Mon Mar 7 14:03:21 CET 2022
Hi,
Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz> writes:
> This is preparing for the move of the code from library to the ksm06.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@suse.com>
> ---
> testcases/kernel/mem/include/mem.h | 2 ++
> testcases/kernel/mem/lib/mem.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/mem/include/mem.h b/testcases/kernel/mem/include/mem.h
> index f1cba5fcb..776809113 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/mem/include/mem.h
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/mem/include/mem.h
> @@ -50,6 +50,8 @@ void testoom(int mempolicy, int lite, int retcode, int allow_sigkill);
>
> void create_same_memory(int size, int num, int unit);
> void test_ksm_merge_across_nodes(unsigned long nr_pages);
> +void ksm_group_check(int run, int pg_shared, int pg_sharing, int pg_volatile,
> + int pg_unshared, int sleep_msecs, int pages_to_scan);
>
> /* THP */
>
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/mem/lib/mem.c b/testcases/kernel/mem/lib/mem.c
> index ee9fc85b6..102fc5665 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/mem/lib/mem.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/mem/lib/mem.c
> @@ -271,9 +271,9 @@ static void final_group_check(int run, int pages_shared, int pages_sharing,
> check("pages_to_scan", pages_to_scan);
> }
>
> -static void group_check(int run, int pages_shared, int pages_sharing,
> - int pages_volatile, int pages_unshared,
> - int sleep_millisecs, int pages_to_scan)
> +void ksm_group_check(int run, int pages_shared, int pages_sharing,
> + int pages_volatile, int pages_unshared,
> + int sleep_millisecs, int pages_to_scan)
> {
> if (run != 1) {
> tst_res(TFAIL, "group_check run is not 1, %d.", run);
> @@ -489,19 +489,19 @@ void create_same_memory(int size, int num, int unit)
>
> resume_ksm_children(child, num);
> stop_ksm_children(child, num);
> - group_check(1, 2, size * num * pages - 2, 0, 0, 0, size * pages * num);
> + ksm_group_check(1, 2, size * num * pages - 2, 0, 0, 0, size * pages * num);
>
> resume_ksm_children(child, num);
> stop_ksm_children(child, num);
> - group_check(1, 3, size * num * pages - 3, 0, 0, 0, size * pages * num);
> + ksm_group_check(1, 3, size * num * pages - 3, 0, 0, 0, size * pages * num);
>
> resume_ksm_children(child, num);
> stop_ksm_children(child, num);
> - group_check(1, 1, size * num * pages - 1, 0, 0, 0, size * pages * num);
> + ksm_group_check(1, 1, size * num * pages - 1, 0, 0, 0, size * pages * num);
>
> resume_ksm_children(child, num);
> stop_ksm_children(child, num);
> - group_check(1, 1, size * num * pages - 2, 0, 1, 0, size * pages * num);
> + ksm_group_check(1, 1, size * num * pages - 2, 0, 1, 0, size * pages * num);
>
> tst_res(TINFO, "KSM unmerging...");
> SAFE_FILE_PRINTF(PATH_KSM "run", "2");
> @@ -586,15 +586,15 @@ void test_ksm_merge_across_nodes(unsigned long nr_pages)
> tst_res(TINFO, "Start to test KSM with merge_across_nodes=1");
> SAFE_FILE_PRINTF(PATH_KSM "merge_across_nodes", "1");
> SAFE_FILE_PRINTF(PATH_KSM "run", "1");
> - group_check(1, 1, nr_pages * num_nodes - 1, 0, 0, 0,
> - nr_pages * num_nodes);
> + ksm_group_check(1, 1, nr_pages * num_nodes - 1, 0, 0, 0,
> + nr_pages * num_nodes);
>
> SAFE_FILE_PRINTF(PATH_KSM "run", "2");
> tst_res(TINFO, "Start to test KSM with merge_across_nodes=0");
> SAFE_FILE_PRINTF(PATH_KSM "merge_across_nodes", "0");
> SAFE_FILE_PRINTF(PATH_KSM "run", "1");
> - group_check(1, num_nodes, nr_pages * num_nodes - num_nodes,
> - 0, 0, 0, nr_pages * num_nodes);
> + ksm_group_check(1, num_nodes, nr_pages * num_nodes - num_nodes,
> + 0, 0, 0, nr_pages * num_nodes);
>
> SAFE_FILE_PRINTF(PATH_KSM "run", "2");
>
> --
> 2.34.1
--
Thank you,
Richard.
More information about the ltp
mailing list