[LTP] [Automated-testing] [PATCH v2 00/30] Introduce runtime and conver tests
Petr Vorel
pvorel@suse.cz
Thu May 5 10:47:01 CEST 2022
Hi all,
> > TODO:
> > This patchset is reasonably complete in a sense that it removes the
> > timeout API at the end. Still there are a few things to consider:
> > - is reusing the -I parameter a good idea? Wouldn't adding new parameter
> > (-r) be better?
But -r is using only when .max_iteration_runtime set, right?
How should it behave on tests which don't set it?
Should -I and -r be mutually exclusive?
Maybe reusing -I would be simpler for users.
> Perhaps we could deprecate -I, but convert it to use the new mechanism
> while trying to keep the behaviour similar.
> I'm not sure we need a global -r option, but unlike -i it's not much
> effort to support. It would not surprise me if there are existing tests
> which don't work with -i.
^^ Do you mean -I ?
Kind regards,
Petr
> > - there are quite likely tests that run for more than a second or a two
> > and should be made runtime aware
> > - anything else?
More information about the ltp
mailing list