[LTP] [PATCH v3] save_restore: Introduce new struct field for flags
Richard Palethorpe
rpalethorpe@suse.de
Tue Nov 15 12:03:38 CET 2022
Hello,
Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz> writes:
> Hi!
>> > Would you consider adding TST_SR_TCONF_MISSING and TST_SR_TCONF_RO?
>>
>> I could set both to 0, if that's OK.
>
> I suppose that would work fine.
>
>> >> +* 'TST_SR_FAIL_MISSING' – End test with 'TBROK' if the file does not exist
>> >
>> > This FAIL part in this name is quite misleading since the test ends with
>> > TBROK. I would say that it would be much more clear if it was named
>> > TST_SR_TBROK_MISSING.
>>
>> Then I should also rename TST_SR_REQUIRED to TST_SR_TBROK, rename
>> TST_SR_COND_ACCESS to TST_SR_SKIP and add TST_SR_TCONF for the two new
>> flags.
>
> That sounds good to me, it's much closely mapped to the actual test
> result types and should be clear enough.
Uh, OK, please ignore my comment on the same subject.
>
> --
> Cyril Hrubis
> chrubis@suse.cz
--
Thank you,
Richard.
More information about the ltp
mailing list