[LTP] [PATCH 2/3] fanotify10: Add support for multiple event files

[Petr Vorel]

> Hello,

> Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> writes:

> > On Mon 21-11-22 10:33:13, Petr Vorel wrote:
> >> Hi Jan, all,

> >> > On Thu 17-11-22 16:58:50, Petr Vorel wrote:
> >> > > Hi Jan, all,

> >> > > > +#define foreach_path(tc, buf, pname) \
> >> > > > +	for (int piter = 0; format_path_check((buf), (tc)->pname##_fmt,	\
> >> > > Unfortunately we still support C99 due old compiler on CentOS 7,
> >> > > therefore int piter needs to be defined outside of for loop.

> >> > Hum, but variable declaration in the for loop is part of C99 standard (as
> >> > the error message also says). So did you want to say you are compiling
> >> > against C89 standard? And CentOS 7 ships with GCC 4.8.5 AFAICS which should
> >> > be fully C99 compliant BTW. So what's the situation here?
> >> I'm sorry, I didn't express clearly myself. Yes, 4.8.5 supports C99,
> >> but the default is C90 [1].

> > OK, thanks for explanation.

> >> > That being said I can workaround the problem in the macro, it will just be
> >> > somewhat uglier. So before doing that I'd like to understand whether
> >> > following C89 is really required...

> >> I'm don't remember why we have just not specified -std=... already, Cyril had
> >> some objections, thus Cc him.

> >> Cent0S EOL in 2024-06, we might reconsider to add -std=... to endup this agony
> >> (errors like this often need to be fixed).

> >> [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.8.5/gcc/Standards.html

> > Given Cyril's reply, should I rework my patch or are we fine with using
> > C99?

> Well -std=c99 doesn't work, but we can use -std=gnu99. If that doesn't
> fix it then we should drop centos07 now IMO.
I'd be ok to put fanotify10: CFLAGS += -std=gnu99 or even CFLAGS += -std=gnu99
(for all tests) into fanotify's Makefile, which fixes the problem.
Unless anybody objects, I can change it before merge.

@Richie: we need to keep Cent0S 7 working until its EOL in 2024-06.

I guess the reason not to specify it in top level Makefile was to have LTP code
being tested on newer standards. Unless there is a good reason for it, I'd vote
for putting -std=gnu99 into top level CFLAGS (and increase it after CentOS 7 EOL).

Kind regards,
Petr

> > 								Honza

> >> > > fanotify10.c:470:2: error: ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only allowed in C99 mode
> >> > >   for (int piter = 0; format_path_check((buf), (tc)->pname##_fmt, \
> >> > >   ^

> >> > > fanotify10.c:470:11: error: redefinition of ‘piter’
> >> > >   for (int piter = 0; format_path_check((buf), (tc)->pname##_fmt, \
> >> > >            ^
> >> > > Kind regards,
> >> > > Petr