[LTP] [RFC PATCH 0/1] brk: use direct syscalls
Petr Vorel
pvorel@suse.cz
Tue Nov 29 14:36:42 CET 2022
> Hi!
> > void verify_brk(void)
> > {
> > if (tst_variant) {
> > tst_res(TINFO, "Testing sbrk()");
> > cur_brk = (uintptr_t)sbrk(0);
> > } else {
> > tst_res(TINFO, "Testing __NR_brk");
> > cur_brk = (void *)tst_syscall(__NR_brk, 0);
> > }
> > }
> > struct tst_test test = {
> > ...
> > #ifdef __GLIBC__
> > .test_variants = 2,
> > #else
> > .test_variants = 1,
> > #endif
> > ...
> > Not sure if it should be testeed also on android, i.e:
> > #if defined(__GLIBC__) || defined(__ANDROID__)
> Can we rather than ifdefing things out check the actual return values?
> Should be as easy as doing:
> if (cur_brk == (void*)-1)
> tst_brk(TCONF, "sbrk() not implemented");
> in the libc test variant.
+1.
WDYT about .test_variants? In that case it'd be tested also on musl
or any platform where it's implemented.
Kind regards,
Petr
More information about the ltp
mailing list