[LTP] [RFC PATCH 0/1] brk: use direct syscalls

[Cyril Hrubis]

Hi!
> >> WDYT about .test_variants? In that case it'd be tested also on musl
> >> or any platform where it's implemented.
> > I would got for it, that way we would test both the kernel implemntation
> > and that libc does something sensible, e.g. returns error.
> >
> I'm still quite new to LTP, so I might be understanding things wrong.
> 
> My understanding of your conversation is that you're suggesting using 
> the .test_variants to have one version of the tests going through the 
> libc wrappers as usual, eventually skipping the test with TCONF if the 
> libc wrapper does not implement the syscall, and one version which would 
> be the the direct syscall I am suggesting in this patch.
> 
> Would that be correct ? If so it does make sense to me, I could try 
> implementing that.

Yes, exactly this.

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz