[LTP] [PATCH] security/ima: limit the scope of the LTP policy rules based on the UUID

[Petr Vorel]

Hi Mimi,

> Hi Petr,

> On Thu, 2022-10-06 at 23:02 +0200, Petr Vorel wrote:
> > Hi Mimi,

> > > The LTP policy rules either replace or extend the global IMA policy. As a
> > > result, the ordering of the LTP IMA tests is important and affects the
> > > ability of re-running the tests.  For example, ima_conditionals.sh
> > > defines a rule to measure user files, while ima_measuremnets.sh verifies
> > > not measuring user files.  Not limiting the LTP IMA policy scope could
> > > also affect the running system.

> > > To allow the LTP tests to be re-run without rebooting the system, limit the
> > > scope of the LTP policy rules to the loopback mounted filesystem based on
> > > the UUID.
> > Thanks a lot for this, that'll be a great simplification for IMA testing.

> By limiting the scope of the IMA policy rules, not everything would
> have to be signed on the file system, which brings us one step closer
> to defining LTP appraise policy rules.

> > I'll have a deeper look tomorrow, but what we need is to ima_setup.sh is to
> > always have loopback device. ATM it's just only if TMPDIR is tmpfs.
> > See patch below (untested, I'll test it tomorrow).

> Agreed.   Seems to be working.  :)
Thanks!

> > Also is the kernel code path very different to use UUID from the current code?

> The code path is the same - either the policy rule matches or it
> doesn't.  Previously, however, the test files being measured could have
> been located on any filesystem.  With this change, the test files now
> have to be on the UUID filesystem.

Good to know. Also, we have new feature in shell API: $TST_ALL_FILESYSTEMS (it
has been for long time for C API as .all_filesystems, which loops the test over
various filesystems: ext2, ext3, ext4, xfs, btrfs, vfat, exfat, ntfs, tmpfs.
Test therefore takes much longer, but it's worth for tests which can behave
differently on various filesystems. I suppose IMA does not need it, right?

> > If yes, we might want also to keep the old behavior enabled with some environment
> > variable (the default would be to use UUID). Or not worth of keeping it?

> Instead of keeping the old behavior, how about defining additional file
> tests that do not match the new UUID policy rule?   These files will
> not be measured.
Correct measurement outside of the loop device? I.e. something in $TST_TMPDIR?
(i.e. /tmp/foo - test unique working directory, $TST_MNTPOINT is mounted on
/tmp/foo/mntpoint, so that we still have working place outside mounted loop device).
Do you mean trying to measure something what expects to fail?

> > I'd also wish to have simple C implementation instead requesting blkid
> > (although util-linux is very common, it's an extra dependency).
> > I might write simple C code which finds which UUID in /dev/disk/by-uuid/ is for
> > loop device should be pretty simple code. But for now it's ok to use blkid,
> > although it should be added into TST_NEEDS_CMDS.

> Sure.  I posted this patch more as a proof of concept than anything
> else.
+1

> > ...
> > > diff --git a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_conditionals.sh b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_conditionals.sh
> > > index 0d50db906..d5c5f3ebe 100755
> > > --- a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_conditionals.sh
> > > +++ b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_conditionals.sh
> > > @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ verify_measurement()
> > >  	ROD rm -f $test_file

> > >  	tst_res TINFO "verify measuring user files when requested via $request"
> > > -	ROD echo "measure $request=$value" \> $IMA_POLICY
> > > +	ROD echo "measure $FSUUID $request=$value" \> $IMA_POLICY
> > >  	ROD echo "$(cat /proc/uptime) $request test" \> $test_file

> > >  	case "$request" in
> > > diff --git a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_policy.sh b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_policy.sh
> > > index af1fb0028..95e7331a4 100755
> > > --- a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_policy.sh
> > > +++ b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_policy.sh
> > > @@ -27,7 +27,12 @@ load_policy()
> > >  	exec 2>/dev/null 4>$IMA_POLICY
> > >  	[ $? -eq 0 ] || exit 1

> > > -	cat $1 >&4 2> /dev/null
> > > +	if [ -n "$FSUUID" ]; then
> > Interesting, would it be correct if there is no UUID with my changes below (i.e.
> > always use the loop device)? Actually, do we also want to have way to disable
> > loop device (obviously only on TMPDIR not being tmpfs).

> If/when using a non loopback device, there should at least be a major
> warning that the global policy has been modified.
OK not quiting whole test with TBROK, but add TWARN (test continue, but later
exits with non-zero).

> > > +		sed "s/measure /measure $FSUUID /" $1 >&4 2> /dev/null
> > > +	else
> > > +		cat $1 >&4 2> /dev/null
> > > +	fi
> > > +
> > >  	ret=$?
> > >  	exec 4>&-

> > > diff --git a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_setup.sh b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_setup.sh
> > > index df3fc5603..016a68cb2 100644
> > > --- a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_setup.sh
> > > +++ b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_setup.sh
> > > @@ -178,6 +178,10 @@ ima_setup()
> > >  	if [ "$TST_MOUNT_DEVICE" = 1 ]; then
> > >  		tst_res TINFO "\$TMPDIR is on tmpfs => run on loop device"
> > >  		cd "$TST_MNTPOINT"
> > > +
> > > +		loopdev=$(mount | grep $TST_MNTPOINT | cut -f1 -d' ')
> > We have $TST_DEVICE for this.

> > > +		FSUUID="fsuuid=$(blkid | grep $loopdev | cut -f2 -d'"')"
> > > +		tst_res TINFO "LTP IMA policy rules based on $FSUUID"
> > >  	fi

> > >  	[ -n "$TST_SETUP_CALLER" ] && $TST_SETUP_CALLER

> > Proposed (not yet tested) changes.


> Thanks, the proposed changes seem to be working.
Thanks a lot for testing. I give it try today and merge it today or early next
week.

Kind regards,
Petr

> thanks,

> Mimi