[LTP] [PATCH] setitimer01: Rewrite using new LTP API

[Richard Palethorpe]

Hello,

Avinesh Kumar <akumar@suse.de> writes:

> Signed-off-by: Avinesh Kumar <akumar@suse.de>
> ---
>  .../kernel/syscalls/setitimer/setitimer01.c   | 162 +++---------------
>  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 135 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/setitimer/setitimer01.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/setitimer/setitimer01.c
> index 6874b94ad..ff443c532 100644
>n --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/setitimer/setitimer01.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/setitimer/setitimer01.c
> @@ -1,157 +1,49 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
>  /*
> - *
>   *   Copyright (c) International Business Machines  Corp., 2001
> - *
> - *   This program is free software;  you can redistribute it and/or modify
> - *   it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> - *   the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
> - *   (at your option) any later version.
> - *
> - *   This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> - *   but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY;  without even the implied warranty of
> - *   MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See
> - *   the GNU General Public License for more details.
> - *
> - *   You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> - *   along with this program;  if not, write to the Free Software
> - *   Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
> + *		03/2001 - Written by Wayne Boyer
> + *   Copyright (c) 2022 SUSE LLC Avinesh Kumar <avinesh.kumar@suse.com>
>   */
>  
> -/*
> - * NAME
> - *	setitimer01.c
> - *
> - * DESCRIPTION
> - *	setitimer01 - check that a resonable setitimer() call succeeds.
> - *
> - * ALGORITHM
> - *	loop if that option was specified
> - *	allocate needed space and set up needed values
> - *	issue the system call
> - *	check the errno value
> - *	  issue a PASS message if we get zero
> - *	otherwise, the tests fails
> - *	  issue a FAIL message
> - *	  break any remaining tests
> - *	  call cleanup
> - *
> - * USAGE:  <for command-line>
> - *  setitimer01 [-c n] [-f] [-i n] [-I x] [-P x] [-t]
> - *     where,  -c n : Run n copies concurrently.
> - *             -f   : Turn off functionality Testing.
> - *	       -i n : Execute test n times.
> - *	       -I x : Execute test for x seconds.
> - *	       -P x : Pause for x seconds between iterations.
> - *	       -t   : Turn on syscall timing.
> - *
> - * HISTORY
> - *	03/2001 - Written by Wayne Boyer
> +/*\
> + * [Description]
>   *
> - * RESTRICTIONS
> - *	none
> + * Verify that setitimer(2) successfully sets the specified timer to
> + * the value provided in new_value argument.
>   */
>  
> -#include "test.h"
> -
> -#include <errno.h>
>  #include <sys/time.h>
> -
> -void cleanup(void);
> -void setup(void);
> -
> -char *TCID = "setitimer01";
> -int TST_TOTAL = 1;
> +#include "tst_test.h"
>  
>  #define SEC0	0
>  #define SEC1	20
>  #define SEC2	40
>  
> -int main(int ac, char **av)
> +static void run(void)
>  {
> -	int lc;
> -	struct itimerval *value, *ovalue;
> -
> -	tst_parse_opts(ac, av, NULL, NULL);
> -
> -	setup();		/* global setup */
> -
> -	/* The following loop checks looping state if -i option given */
> -
> -	for (lc = 0; TEST_LOOPING(lc); lc++) {
> -		/* reset tst_count in case we are looping */
> -		tst_count = 0;
> -
> -		/* allocate some space for the timer structures */
> +	struct itimerval *new_value, *old_value;
>  
> -		if ((value = malloc((size_t)sizeof(struct itimerval))) ==
> -		    NULL) {
> -			tst_brkm(TBROK, cleanup, "value malloc failed");
> -		}
> +	new_value = SAFE_MALLOC(sizeof(struct itimerval));
> +	old_value = SAFE_MALLOC(sizeof(struct itimerval));

Why (continue to) use malloc?

Ideally this can be changed to guarded buffers, but stack variables
would also be fine.

>  
> -		if ((ovalue = malloc((size_t)sizeof(struct itimerval))) ==
> -		    NULL) {
> -			tst_brkm(TBROK, cleanup, "ovalue malloc failed");
> -		}
> +	new_value->it_value.tv_sec = SEC1;
> +	new_value->it_value.tv_usec = SEC0;
> +	new_value->it_interval.tv_sec = 0;
> +	new_value->it_interval.tv_usec = 0;
>  
> -		/* set up some reasonable values */
> +	TST_EXP_PASS(setitimer(ITIMER_REAL, new_value, old_value));
>  
> -		value->it_value.tv_sec = SEC1;
> -		value->it_value.tv_usec = SEC0;
> -		value->it_interval.tv_sec = 0;
> -		value->it_interval.tv_usec = 0;
> -		/*
> -		 * issue the system call with the TEST() macro
> -		 * ITIMER_REAL = 0, ITIMER_VIRTUAL = 1 and ITIMER_PROF = 2
> -		 */
> +	new_value->it_value.tv_sec = SEC2;
> +	new_value->it_value.tv_usec = SEC0;
>  
> -		TEST(setitimer(ITIMER_REAL, value, ovalue));
> +	TST_EXP_PASS_SILENT(setitimer(ITIMER_REAL, new_value, old_value));
>  
> -		if (TEST_RETURN != 0) {
> -			tst_resm(TFAIL, "call failed - errno = %d - %s",
> -				 TEST_ERRNO, strerror(TEST_ERRNO));
> -			continue;
> -		}
> -
> -		/*
> -		 * call setitimer again with new values.
> -		 * the old values should be stored in ovalue
> -		 */
> -		value->it_value.tv_sec = SEC2;
> -		value->it_value.tv_usec = SEC0;
> -
> -		if ((setitimer(ITIMER_REAL, value, ovalue)) == -1) {
> -			tst_brkm(TBROK, cleanup, "second setitimer "
> -				 "call failed");
> -		}
> -
> -		if (ovalue->it_value.tv_sec <= SEC1) {
> -			tst_resm(TPASS, "functionality is correct");
> -		} else {
> -			tst_brkm(TFAIL, cleanup, "old timer value is "
> -				 "not equal to expected value");
> -		}
> -	}
> -
> -	cleanup();
> -	tst_exit();
> -}
> -
> -/*
> - * setup() - performs all the ONE TIME setup for this test.
> - */
> -void setup(void)
> -{
> -
> -	tst_sig(NOFORK, DEF_HANDLER, cleanup);
> -
> -	TEST_PAUSE;
> +	if ((old_value->it_value.tv_sec <= SEC1) && (old_value->it_value.tv_sec > SEC1 - 5))
> +		tst_res(TPASS, "old_value correctly updated with previous timer value");
> +	else
> +		tst_res(TFAIL, "old_value is not correctly updated with
> previous timer value");

The itimerval memory is leaked here if we use -i.

>  }
>  
> -/*
> - * cleanup() - performs all the ONE TIME cleanup for this test at completion
> - * 	       or premature exit.
> - */
> -void cleanup(void)
> -{
> -
> -}
> +static struct tst_test test = {
> +	.test_all = run
> +};
> -- 
> 2.37.3

Otherwise looks good.


-- 
Thank you,
Richard.