[LTP] [PATCH v2 2/2] setitimer01: rewrite using new API
Richard Palethorpe
rpalethorpe@suse.de
Mon Oct 24 08:58:44 CEST 2022
Hello,
Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com> writes:
>
> -#include "test.h"
> -
> #include <errno.h>
> #include <sys/time.h>
> +#include <stdlib.h>
> +#include "tst_test.h"
> +#include "lapi/syscalls.h"
> +
> +#define USEC1 10000
> +#define USEC2 20000
> +
> +static struct itimerval *value, *ovalue;
> +
> +static struct tcase {
> + int which;
> + char *des;
> + int signo;
> +} tcases[] = {
> + {ITIMER_REAL, "ITIMER_REAL", SIGALRM},
> + {ITIMER_VIRTUAL, "ITIMER_VIRTUAL", SIGVTALRM},
> + {ITIMER_PROF, "ITIMER_PROF", SIGPROF},
> +};
> +
> +static int sys_setitimer(int which, void *new_value, void *old_value)
> +{
> + return tst_syscall(__NR_setitimer, which, new_value, old_value);
> +}
> +
> +static void set_setitimer_value(int usec, int o_usec)
> +{
> + value->it_value.tv_sec = 0;
> + value->it_value.tv_usec = usec;
> + value->it_interval.tv_sec = 0;
> + value->it_interval.tv_usec = 0;
> +
> + ovalue->it_value.tv_sec = o_usec;
> + ovalue->it_value.tv_usec = o_usec;
> + ovalue->it_interval.tv_sec = 0;
> + ovalue->it_interval.tv_usec = 0;
> +}
>
> -void cleanup(void);
> -void setup(void);
> +static void verify_setitimer(unsigned int i)
> +{
> + pid_t pid;
> + int status;
> + struct tcase *tc = &tcases[i];
>
> -char *TCID = "setitimer01";
> -int TST_TOTAL = 1;
> + pid = SAFE_FORK();
>
> -#define SEC0 0
> -#define SEC1 20
> -#define SEC2 40
> + if (pid == 0) {
> + tst_res(TINFO, "tc->which = %s", tc->des);
>
> -int main(int ac, char **av)
> -{
> - int lc;
> - struct itimerval *value, *ovalue;
> -
> - tst_parse_opts(ac, av, NULL, NULL);
> -
> - setup(); /* global setup */
> -
> - /* The following loop checks looping state if -i option given */
> -
> - for (lc = 0; TEST_LOOPING(lc); lc++) {
> - /* reset tst_count in case we are looping */
> - tst_count = 0;
> -
> - /* allocate some space for the timer structures */
> -
> - if ((value = malloc((size_t)sizeof(struct itimerval))) ==
> - NULL) {
> - tst_brkm(TBROK, cleanup, "value malloc failed");
> - }
> -
> - if ((ovalue = malloc((size_t)sizeof(struct itimerval))) ==
> - NULL) {
> - tst_brkm(TBROK, cleanup, "ovalue malloc failed");
> - }
> -
> - /* set up some reasonable values */
> -
> - value->it_value.tv_sec = SEC1;
> - value->it_value.tv_usec = SEC0;
> - value->it_interval.tv_sec = 0;
> - value->it_interval.tv_usec = 0;
> - /*
> - * issue the system call with the TEST() macro
> - * ITIMER_REAL = 0, ITIMER_VIRTUAL = 1 and ITIMER_PROF = 2
> - */
> -
> - TEST(setitimer(ITIMER_REAL, value, ovalue));
> -
> - if (TEST_RETURN != 0) {
> - tst_resm(TFAIL, "call failed - errno = %d - %s",
> - TEST_ERRNO, strerror(TEST_ERRNO));
> - continue;
> - }
> -
> - /*
> - * call setitimer again with new values.
> - * the old values should be stored in ovalue
> - */
> - value->it_value.tv_sec = SEC2;
> - value->it_value.tv_usec = SEC0;
> -
> - if ((setitimer(ITIMER_REAL, value, ovalue)) == -1) {
> - tst_brkm(TBROK, cleanup, "second setitimer "
> - "call failed");
> - }
> -
> - if (ovalue->it_value.tv_sec <= SEC1) {
> - tst_resm(TPASS, "functionality is correct");
> - } else {
> - tst_brkm(TFAIL, cleanup, "old timer value is "
> - "not equal to expected value");
> - }
> - }
> + tst_no_corefile(0);
>
> - cleanup();
> - tst_exit();
> -}
> + set_setitimer_value(USEC1, 0);
> + TST_EXP_PASS(sys_setitimer(tc->which, value, NULL));
>
> -/*
> - * setup() - performs all the ONE TIME setup for this test.
> - */
> -void setup(void)
> -{
> + set_setitimer_value(USEC2, USEC2);
> + TST_EXP_PASS(sys_setitimer(tc->which, value, ovalue));
>
> - tst_sig(NOFORK, DEF_HANDLER, cleanup);
> + if (ovalue->it_value.tv_sec != 0 || ovalue->it_value.tv_usec >= USEC2)
> + tst_brk(TFAIL, "old timer value is not within
> the expected range");
Maybe we could split testing the return value and ovalue from testing
the signal is delivered?
When testing the return value and ovalue; a very long timeout can be
used (which is never hit). When testing the signal a very short one can
be used.
This way, the test is not racing with the signal and the loop below
won't be executed much.
In any case LGTM
Reviewed-by: Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@suse.com>
>
> - TEST_PAUSE;
> -}
> + for (;;)
> + ;
> + }
>
> -/*
> - * cleanup() - performs all the ONE TIME cleanup for this test at completion
> - * or premature exit.
> - */
> -void cleanup(void)
> -{
> + SAFE_WAITPID(pid, &status, 0);
>
> + if (WIFSIGNALED(status) && WTERMSIG(status) == tc->signo)
> + tst_res(TPASS, "Child received signal: %s", tst_strsig(tc->signo));
> + else
> + tst_res(TFAIL, "Child: %s", tst_strstatus(status));
> }
> +
> +static struct tst_test test = {
> + .tcnt = ARRAY_SIZE(tcases),
> + .forks_child = 1,
> + .test = verify_setitimer,
> + .bufs = (struct tst_buffers[]) {
> + {&value, .size = sizeof(struct itimerval)},
> + {&ovalue, .size = sizeof(struct itimerval)},
> + {}
> + }
> +};
> --
> 2.35.3
--
Thank you,
Richard.
More information about the ltp
mailing list