[LTP] [PATCH 2/2] getitimer01: add checking for nonzero timer
Li Wang
liwang@redhat.com
Tue Oct 25 14:18:53 CEST 2022
By default a new process disabled the timer and getitimer()
returned zero value. But we also need to check if the timer
is correct when reset to nonzero.
Signed-off-by: Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com>
---
.../kernel/syscalls/getitimer/getitimer01.c | 59 +++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/getitimer/getitimer01.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/getitimer/getitimer01.c
index 5ecfac55c..41903db07 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/getitimer/getitimer01.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/getitimer/getitimer01.c
@@ -13,24 +13,57 @@
#include "tst_test.h"
-static int itimer_name[] = {
- ITIMER_REAL,
- ITIMER_VIRTUAL,
- ITIMER_PROF,
+static struct itimerval *value;
+
+static struct tcase {
+ int which;
+ char *des;
+} tcases[] = {
+ {ITIMER_REAL, "ITIMER_REAL"},
+ {ITIMER_VIRTUAL, "ITIMER_VIRTUAL"},
+ {ITIMER_PROF, "ITIMER_PROF"},
};
-static void run(void)
+static void set_setitimer_value(int sec, int usec)
{
- long unsigned int i;
- struct itimerval value;
+ value->it_value.tv_sec = sec;
+ value->it_value.tv_usec = usec;
+ value->it_interval.tv_sec = sec;
+ value->it_interval.tv_usec = usec;
+}
- for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(itimer_name); i++) {
- TST_EXP_PASS(getitimer(itimer_name[i], &value));
- TST_EXP_EQ_LI(value.it_value.tv_sec, 0);
- TST_EXP_EQ_LI(value.it_value.tv_usec, 0);
- }
+static void verify_getitimer(unsigned int i)
+{
+ struct tcase *tc = &tcases[i];
+
+ tst_res(TINFO, "tc->which = %s", tc->des);
+ TST_EXP_PASS(getitimer(tc->which, value));
+
+ TST_EXP_EQ_LI(value->it_value.tv_sec, 0);
+ TST_EXP_EQ_LI(value->it_value.tv_usec, 0);
+ TST_EXP_EQ_LI(value->it_interval.tv_sec, 0);
+ TST_EXP_EQ_LI(value->it_interval.tv_usec, 0);
+
+ set_setitimer_value(100, 100);
+ TST_EXP_PASS_SILENT(setitimer(tc->which, value, NULL));
+
+ set_setitimer_value(0, 0);
+ TST_EXP_PASS(getitimer(tc->which, value));
+
+ TST_EXP_EQ_LI(value->it_interval.tv_sec, 100);
+ TST_EXP_EQ_LI(value->it_interval.tv_usec, 100);
+
+ if (value->it_value.tv_sec + value->it_value.tv_usec/1000000 <= 100)
+ tst_res(TPASS, "timer value is within the expected range");
+ else
+ tst_res(TFAIL, "timer value is not within the expected range");
}
static struct tst_test test = {
- .test_all = run
+ .tcnt = ARRAY_SIZE(tcases),
+ .test = verify_getitimer,
+ .bufs = (struct tst_buffers[]) {
+ {&value, .size = sizeof(struct itimerval)},
+ {}
+ }
};
--
2.35.3
More information about the ltp
mailing list