[LTP] [PATCH] getsid02.c: Rewrite using new LTP API

[Avinesh Kumar]

Hi Li,

On Wednesday, August 31, 2022 12:10:44 PM IST Li Wang wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 6:54 PM Avinesh Kumar <akumar@suse.de> wrote:
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Avinesh Kumar <akumar@suse.de>
> > ---
> >  testcases/kernel/syscalls/getsid/getsid02.c | 83 +++++----------------
> >  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/getsid/getsid02.c
> > b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/getsid/getsid02.c
> > index b5ab339e2..c235af362 100644
> > --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/getsid/getsid02.c
> > +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/getsid/getsid02.c
> > @@ -1,81 +1,32 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> >  /*
> > - *
> >   *   Copyright (c) International Business Machines  Corp., 2001
> >   *   Copyright (c) 2012 Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
> > - *
> > - *   This program is free software;  you can redistribute it and/or modify
> > - *   it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> > - *   the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
> > - *   (at your option) any later version.
> > - *
> > - *   This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> > - *   but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY;  without even the implied warranty of
> > - *   MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See
> > - *   the GNU General Public License for more details.
> > - *
> > - *   You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> > - *   along with this program;  if not, write to the Free Software
> > - *   Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA
> > 02110-1301 USA
> > + *   Copyright (c) 2022 SUSE LLC Avinesh Kumar <avinesh.kumar@suse.com>
> >   */
> >
> > -#define _GNU_SOURCE 1
> > -
> > -#include "test.h"
> > -
> > -#include <errno.h>
> > +/*\
> > + * [Description]
> > + *
> > + * Verify that getsid(2) fails with ESRCH errno when there is no
> > + * process found with process ID pid.
> > + */
> >
> > -char *TCID = "getsid02";
> > -int TST_TOTAL = 1;
> > +#include "tst_test.h"
> >
> >  static pid_t unused_pid;
> >
> > -static void cleanup(void);
> > -static void setup(void);
> > -
> > -int main(int ac, char **av)
> > +static void setup(void)
> >  {
> > -       int lc;
> > -
> > -       tst_parse_opts(ac, av, NULL, NULL);
> > -
> > -       setup();
> > -
> > -       for (lc = 0; TEST_LOOPING(lc); lc++) {
> > -               tst_count = 0;
> > -
> > -               TEST(getsid(unused_pid));
> > -
> > -               if (TEST_RETURN == 0) {
> > -                       tst_resm(TFAIL, "call succeed when failure
> > expected");
> > -                       continue;
> > -               }
> > -
> > -               switch (TEST_ERRNO) {
> > -               case ESRCH:
> > -                       tst_resm(TPASS, "expected failure - errno = %d -
> > %s",
> > -                                TEST_ERRNO, strerror(TEST_ERRNO));
> > -                       break;
> > -               default:
> > -                       tst_resm(TFAIL, "call failed to produce "
> > -                                "expected error - errno = %d - %s",
> > -                                TEST_ERRNO, strerror(TEST_ERRNO));
> > -                       break;
> > -               }
> > -       }
> > -
> > -       cleanup();
> > -       tst_exit();
> > +       unused_pid = tst_get_unused_pid();
> >
> 
> We can simply move this to the main function to avoid unused PID
> reusing again if people perform test with '-i N'.
> 
> How about this below:
> 
> #include "tst_test.h"
> 
> static void run(void)
> {
>     pid_t unused_pid;
>     unused_pid = tst_get_unused_pid();
> 
>     TST_EXP_FAIL(getsid(unused_pid), ESRCH);
> }
> 
> static struct tst_test test = {
>     .test_all = run
> };
> 
> 
Yes, I agree to your suggestion. But while testing '-i N' with this code
also I am getting the same unused_pid which is equal to 
/proc/sys/kernel/pid_max in my env.


Regards,
Avinesh