[LTP] [PATCH v2 1/2] syscalls/readlinkat01: Convert to new API
Yang Xu (Fujitsu)
xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com
Fri Aug 25 08:21:31 CEST 2023
Hi Cyril
> Hi!
>> +static struct tcase {
>> + int *fd;
>> + const char **path;
>> const char *exp_buf;
>> int exp_ret;
>> int exp_errno;
> The last three fields are not unused anymore.
Agree.
>> -} test_cases[] = {
>> - {&dir_fd, TEST_SYMLINK, TEST_FILE, sizeof(TEST_FILE)-1, 0},
>> - {&dir_fd, abspath, TEST_FILE, sizeof(TEST_FILE)-1, 0},
>> - {&fd, TEST_SYMLINK, NULL, -1, ENOTDIR},
>> - {&fd_invalid, TEST_SYMLINK, NULL, -1, EBADF},
>> - {&fd_atcwd, TEST_SYMLINK, TEST_FILE, sizeof(TEST_FILE)-1, 0},
>> +} tcases[] = {
>> + {&dir_fd, &testsymlink, TEST_FILE, sizeof(TEST_FILE)-1, 0},
>> + {&dir_fd, &abspath, TEST_FILE, sizeof(TEST_FILE)-1, 0},
>> + {&file_fd, &abspath, TEST_FILE, sizeof(TEST_FILE)-1, 0},
>> + {&fd_atcwd, &testsymlink, TEST_FILE, sizeof(TEST_FILE)-1, 0},
>> + {&fd_atcwd, &abspath, TEST_FILE, sizeof(TEST_FILE)-1, 0},
>> };
> Looking at readlinkat() manual page thre is a special case where the
> pathname is empty string and the call operates on the dirfd, i.e.
> attempts to resolve a directory symlink. Can we please add that case
> as well? Can be done in follow up patch...
ok.I'll update it in the v3 version.
>> -int TST_TOTAL = ARRAY_SIZE(test_cases);
>> -
>> -static void verify_readlinkat(struct test_case *test)
>> +static void verify_readlinkat(unsigned int i)
>> {
>> char buf[1024];
>> + struct tcase *tc = &tcases[i];
>>
>> memset(buf, 0, sizeof(buf));
>>
>> - TEST(readlinkat(*test->dir_fd, test->path, buf, sizeof(buf)));
>> -
>> - if (TEST_RETURN != test->exp_ret) {
>> - tst_resm(TFAIL | TTERRNO,
>> - "readlinkat() returned %ld, expected %d",
>> - TEST_RETURN, test->exp_ret);
>> - return;
>> - }
>> -
>> - if (TEST_ERRNO != test->exp_errno) {
>> - tst_resm(TFAIL | TTERRNO,
>> - "readlinkat() returned %ld, expected %d",
>> - TEST_RETURN, test->exp_ret);
>> - return;
>> - }
>> -
>> - if (test->exp_ret > 0 && strcmp(test->exp_buf, buf)) {
>> - tst_resm(TFAIL, "Unexpected buffer have '%s', expected '%s'",
>> - buf, test->exp_buf);
>> - return;
>> - }
>> -
>> - tst_resm(TPASS | TTERRNO, "readlinkat() returned %ld", TEST_RETURN);
>> -}
>> -
>> -int main(int ac, char **av)
>> -{
>> - int lc;
>> - int i;
>> -
>> - tst_parse_opts(ac, av, NULL, NULL);
>> -
>> - setup();
>> -
>> - for (lc = 0; TEST_LOOPING(lc); lc++) {
>> - for (i = 0; i < TST_TOTAL; i++)
>> - verify_readlinkat(&test_cases[i]);
>> - }
>> -
>> - cleanup();
>> - tst_exit();
>> + TST_EXP_POSITIVE(readlinkat(*tc->fd, *tc->path, buf, sizeof(buf)),
>> + "readlinkat(%d, %s, %s, %ld)",
>> + *tc->fd, *tc->path, buf, sizeof(buf));
> Can we check that the buf was filled in with the right file name here as
> well? We did that in the original test. I guess that we can just do:
>
> if (strcmp(buf, TEST_FILE))
> tst_res(TPASS, "The filename in buffer is correct");
> else
> tst_res(TFAIL, "Wrong filename in buffer '%s'", buf);
ok.I'll add this.
and i think "if (strcmp(buf, TEST_FILE))" should be changed to "if
(strcmp(buf, TEST_FILE) == 0)".
>> }
>>
>> static void setup(void)
>> {
>> - tst_tmpdir();
>> char *tmpdir = tst_get_tmpdir();
>>
>> - snprintf(abspath, sizeof(abspath), "%s/" TEST_SYMLINK, tmpdir);
>> + abspath = tst_aprintf("%s/" TEST_SYMLINK, tmpdir);
>> free(tmpdir);
>>
>> - fd = SAFE_OPEN(cleanup, TEST_FILE, O_CREAT, 0600);
>> - SAFE_SYMLINK(cleanup, TEST_FILE, TEST_SYMLINK);
>> - dir_fd = SAFE_OPEN(cleanup, ".", O_DIRECTORY);
>> -
>> - TEST_PAUSE;
>> + file_fd = SAFE_OPEN(TEST_FILE, O_CREAT, 0600);
>> + SAFE_SYMLINK(TEST_FILE, TEST_SYMLINK);
>> + dir_fd = SAFE_OPEN(".", O_DIRECTORY);
>> }
>>
>> static void cleanup(void)
>> {
>> - if (fd > 0 && close(fd))
>> - tst_resm(TWARN | TERRNO, "Failed to close fd");
>> -
>> - if (dir_fd > 0 && close(dir_fd))
>> - tst_resm(TWARN | TERRNO, "Failed to close dir_fd");
>> + if (file_fd > -1)
>> + SAFE_CLOSE(file_fd);
>>
>> - tst_rmdir();
>> + if (dir_fd > -1)
>> + SAFE_CLOSE(dir_fd);
>> }
>> +
>> +static struct tst_test test = {
>> + .test = verify_readlinkat,
>> + .needs_tmpdir = 1,
>> + .setup = setup,
>> + .cleanup = cleanup,
>> + .bufs = (struct tst_buffers []) {
>> + {&abspath, .size = sizeof(char)},
> Again, the abspath is initialized dynamically in setup() no need to
> allocate it here.
ok.
Thanks for the patient review.
Best Regards
Yang Xu
>> + {&testsymlink, .str = TEST_SYMLINK},
>> + {},
>> + },
>> + .tcnt = ARRAY_SIZE(tcases),
>> +};
>> --
>> 2.39.1
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
More information about the ltp
mailing list