[LTP] [PATCH] Add hugemmap41(Migrating the libhugetlbfs/testcases/slbpacaflush.c test)

[Shirisha G]

We are verifying ppc64 kernels prior to 2.6.15-rc5 exhibit a bug in the
hugepage SLB flushing path. When opening new hugetlb areas, updating masks
in the thread_struct and copying to the PACA only occurs on the CPU where
segments are opened, leading to potential stale copies in other CPUs.
This bug can be triggered by multiple threads sharing the mm or a single thread
migrating between CPUs, particularly evident in a close-to-idle system,
as other processes may flush the SLB and prevent the bug from manifesting.

Original test originates from https://github.com/libhugetlbfs/libhugetlbfs/blob/master/tests/slbpacaflush.c

Signed-off-by: Shirisha G <shirisha@linux.ibm.com>
---
 runtest/hugetlb                               |   1 +
 testcases/kernel/mem/.gitignore               |   1 +
 .../kernel/mem/hugetlb/hugemmap/hugemmap41.c  | 144 ++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 146 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 testcases/kernel/mem/hugetlb/hugemmap/hugemmap41.c

diff --git a/runtest/hugetlb b/runtest/hugetlb
index 299c07ac9..d956866ac 100644
--- a/runtest/hugetlb
+++ b/runtest/hugetlb
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ hugemmap29 hugemmap29
 hugemmap30 hugemmap30
 hugemmap31 hugemmap31
 hugemmap32 hugemmap32
+hugemmap41 hugemmap41
 hugemmap05_1 hugemmap05 -m
 hugemmap05_2 hugemmap05 -s
 hugemmap05_3 hugemmap05 -s -m
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/mem/.gitignore b/testcases/kernel/mem/.gitignore
index c96fe8bfc..b7e108956 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/mem/.gitignore
+++ b/testcases/kernel/mem/.gitignore
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
 /hugetlb/hugemmap/hugemmap30
 /hugetlb/hugemmap/hugemmap31
 /hugetlb/hugemmap/hugemmap32
+/hugetlb/hugemmap/hugemmap41
 /hugetlb/hugeshmat/hugeshmat01
 /hugetlb/hugeshmat/hugeshmat02
 /hugetlb/hugeshmat/hugeshmat03
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/mem/hugetlb/hugemmap/hugemmap41.c b/testcases/kernel/mem/hugetlb/hugemmap/hugemmap41.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..3b3388c68
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testcases/kernel/mem/hugetlb/hugemmap/hugemmap41.c
@@ -0,0 +1,144 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2005-2006 IBM Corporation.
+ * Author: David Gibson & Adam Litke
+ */
+/*\
+ * [Description]
+ *
+ * ppc64 kernels (prior to 2.6.15-rc5) have a bug in the hugepage SLB
+ * flushing path.  After opening new hugetlb areas, we update the
+ * masks in the thread_struct, copy to the PACA, then do slbies on
+ * each CPU.  The trouble is we only copy to the PACA on the CPU where
+ * we're opening the segments, which can leave a stale copy in the
+ * PACAs on other CPUs.
+ *
+ * This can be triggered either with multiple threads sharing the mm,
+ * or with a single thread which is migrated from one CPU, to another
+ * (where the mapping occurs), then back again (where we touch the
+ * stale SLB).  We use the second method in this test, since it's
+ * easier to force (using sched_setaffinity).  However it relies on a
+ * close-to-idle system, if any process other than a kernel thread
+ * runs on the first CPU between runs of the test process, the SLB
+ * will be flushed and we won't trigger the bug, hence the
+ * PASS_INCONCLUSIVE().  Obviously, this test won't work on a 1-cpu
+ * system (should get CONFIG() on the sched_setaffinity)
+ *
+ */
+#define _GNU_SOURCE
+#include "hugetlb.h"
+#define SYSFS_CPU_ONLINE_FMT	"/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu%d/online"
+#define MNTPOINT "hugetlbfs/"
+
+
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <sched.h>
+
+
+long hpage_size;
+int fd;
+void *p;
+volatile unsigned long *q;
+int online_cpus[2], err;
+cpu_set_t cpu0, cpu1;
+
+
+
+void check_online_cpus(int online_cpus[], int nr_cpus_needed)
+{
+	char cpu_state, path_buf[64];
+	int total_cpus, cpu_idx, fd, ret, i;
+
+	total_cpus = get_nprocs_conf();
+	cpu_idx = 0;
+
+	if (get_nprocs() < nr_cpus_needed)
+		tst_res(TFAIL, "Atleast online %d cpus are required", nr_cpus_needed);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < total_cpus && cpu_idx < nr_cpus_needed; i++) {
+		errno = 0;
+		sprintf(path_buf, SYSFS_CPU_ONLINE_FMT, i);
+		fd = open(path_buf, O_RDONLY);
+		if (fd < 0) {
+			/* If 'online' is absent, the cpu cannot be offlined */
+			if (errno == ENOENT) {
+				online_cpus[cpu_idx] = i;
+				cpu_idx++;
+				continue;
+			} else {
+				tst_res(TFAIL, "Unable to open %s: %s", path_buf,
+				     strerror(errno));
+			}
+		}
+
+		ret = read(fd, &cpu_state, 1);
+		if (ret < 1)
+			tst_res(TFAIL, "Unable to read %s: %s", path_buf,
+			     strerror(errno));
+
+		if (cpu_state == '1') {
+			online_cpus[cpu_idx] = i;
+			cpu_idx++;
+		}
+
+		if (fd >= 0)
+			SAFE_CLOSE(fd);
+	}
+
+	if (cpu_idx < nr_cpus_needed)
+		tst_res(TFAIL, "Atleast %d online cpus were not found", nr_cpus_needed);
+}
+
+
+static void run_test(void)
+{
+	check_online_cpus(online_cpus, 2);
+	CPU_ZERO(&cpu0);
+	CPU_SET(online_cpus[0], &cpu0);
+	CPU_ZERO(&cpu1);
+	CPU_SET(online_cpus[1], &cpu1);
+
+	err = sched_setaffinity(getpid(), CPU_SETSIZE/8, &cpu0);
+	if (err != 0)
+		tst_res(TFAIL, "sched_setaffinity(cpu%d): %s", online_cpus[0],
+				strerror(errno));
+
+	err = sched_setaffinity(getpid(), CPU_SETSIZE/8, &cpu1);
+
+	if (err != 0)
+		tst_res(TFAIL, "sched_setaffinity(cpu%d): %s", online_cpus[1],
+				strerror(errno));
+	p = SAFE_MMAP(NULL, hpage_size, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
+
+	err = sched_setaffinity(getpid(), CPU_SETSIZE/8, &cpu0);
+	if (err != 0)
+		tst_res(TFAIL, "sched_setaffinity(cpu%d): %s", online_cpus[0],
+				strerror(errno));
+	q = (volatile unsigned long *)(p + getpagesize());
+	*q = 0xdeadbeef;
+
+	tst_res(TPASS, "Test Passed inconclusive");
+}
+
+static void setup(void)
+{
+	hpage_size = tst_get_hugepage_size();
+	fd = tst_creat_unlinked(MNTPOINT, 0);
+}
+
+void cleanup(void)
+{
+	if (fd > 0)
+		SAFE_CLOSE(fd);
+}
+
+static struct tst_test test = {
+	.needs_root = 1,
+	.mntpoint = MNTPOINT,
+	.needs_hugetlbfs = 1,
+	.needs_tmpdir = 1,
+	.setup = setup,
+	.cleanup = cleanup,
+	.test_all = run_test,
+	.hugepages = {1, TST_NEEDS},
+};
-- 
2.39.3