[LTP] [PATCH v3 1/3] lib/tests: Add test for testing tst_res() flags

[Petr Vorel]

> > Hi!
> > > > Maybe it would make sense the loop over the flags here instead, so that
> > > > we don't have to produce second TPASS message.

> > > I'm not sure if I follow you. I wanted to use the flag in tst_res(),
> > > but for these two there would be tst_brk(TBROK) due missing result.

> > I mean that if we put TBROK last in the array we can do:

> > 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(...); i++)
FYI TBROK can stay, because we test tst_res().

I add also add similar test in shell API (IMHO there still can be bugs in shell
API implementation).

Kind regards,
Petr

> > 		tst_res(....);

> Yeah, I realized that later (it was too late already when I wrote the question).
> My motivation was that extra TPASS also test functionality, we test, that TINFO
> and TDEBUG are not results. But this is probably not important, thus I'll just
> loop over array. And sure, I'll put TBROK to the end.

> Kind regards,
> Petr

> > I.e. loop over all the flags in a single call of the function, which
> > would mean that we do not have to add artificial TPASS at the end.