[LTP] [PATCH 6/9] tst_net.sh: Rename function + add doc
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
Wed Feb 8 15:05:54 CET 2023
Hi!
> > What I didn't get here is why do we put the code to detect IPV6 into two
> > different functions and then call it twice nearly from the same place in
> > the library. Is there a reason why can't we put the sysctl check right
> > after the proc check in the current ipv6 detection function?
>
> Well, the old check (cmdline check for ipv6.disable=1) must be run before
> creating interfaces. But the new sysctl based tests test interfaces
> (${L,R}HOST_IFACES). Technically it could be run just after ipv6.disable=1
> check, because it's needed only for the non-default ssh based two host setup [1].
> But ${L,R}HOST_IFACES initialization:
>
> export LHOST_IFACES="${LHOST_IFACES:-eth0}"
> export RHOST_IFACES="${RHOST_IFACES:-eth0}"
>
> would have to be moved before this check and run only for ssh based test
> (the default netns based single host will create interfaces in init_ltp_netspace()
> and for them ipv6.disable=1 check is good enough). I wanted to keep variables in
> single place, but I'm ok to add this exception. Or we can keep variables where
> they are and run this check on ${LHOST_IFACES:-} and ${RHOST_IFACES:-} (i.e.
> only if these interfaces are set externally - which should be only on ssh two
> host based setup).
>
> I also thought that having to run this new check separately could be useful
> (setup can change any time). But as nobody required that /complained it's
> needed, let's ignore this.
Ah, it's more complicated than a single switch, there is actually a
master swtich, default settings and per interface settings.
i.e. /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/default/disable_ipv6
/proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/all/disable_ipv6
/proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/${IFACE}/disable_ipv6
Since the deafult value is I suppose inherited by newly added interfaces
we have to check if ipv6 is disabled by sysctl in the case of network
namespaces as well, right? Technically we could probably check the
default/disable_ipv6 before we attempt to create new interfaces, but I
guess that we woudl rather want to have the same code both for ssh and
namespaces.
--
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
More information about the ltp
mailing list