[LTP] [PATCH] setreuid04.c: Rewrite using new LTP API
Richard Palethorpe
rpalethorpe@suse.de
Thu Jan 12 11:37:45 CET 2023
Hello,
Avinesh Kumar <akumar@suse.de> writes:
> Signed-off-by: Avinesh Kumar <akumar@suse.de>
> ---
> .../kernel/syscalls/setreuid/setreuid04.c | 158 +++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 117 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/setreuid/setreuid04.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/setreuid/setreuid04.c
> index 8eed90df0..9c52ff1bd 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/setreuid/setreuid04.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/setreuid/setreuid04.c
> @@ -1,141 +1,65 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> /*
> * Copyright (c) International Business Machines Corp., 2001
> - *
> - * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> - * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> - * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
> - * (at your option) any later version.
> - *
> - * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> - * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> - * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See
> - * the GNU General Public License for more details.
> - *
> - * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> - * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
> - * Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
> - *
> * Ported by John George
> + * Copyright (c) 2022 SUSE LLC Avinesh Kumar <avinesh.kumar@suse.com>
> */
>
> -/*
> - * Test that root can change the real and effective uid to an
> - * unpriviledged user.
> +/*\
> + * [Description]
> + *
> + * Verify that root user can change the real and effective uid to an
> + * unprivileged user.
> */
>
> -#include <errno.h>
> -#include <stdlib.h>
> #include <pwd.h>
> -#include <sys/wait.h>
> -
> -#include "test.h"
> -#include "compat_16.h"
> -
> -TCID_DEFINE(setreuid04);
> +#include "tst_test.h"
> +#include "compat_tst_16.h"
>
> static uid_t neg_one = -1;
> +static uid_t root_uid, nobody_uid;
>
> -static struct passwd nobody, root;
> -
> -/*
> - * The following structure contains all test data. Each structure in the array
> - * is used for a separate test. The tests are executed in the for loop below.
> - */
> -
> -struct test_data_t {
> +static struct tcase {
> uid_t *real_uid;
> uid_t *eff_uid;
> - struct passwd *exp_real_usr;
> - struct passwd *exp_eff_usr;
> - char *test_msg;
> -} test_data[] = {
> - {
> - &neg_one, &neg_one, &root, &root, "After setreuid(-1, nobody),"}, {
> -&nobody.pw_uid, &nobody.pw_uid, &nobody, &nobody,
> - "After setreuid(-1, -1),"},};
> -
> -int TST_TOTAL = ARRAY_SIZE(test_data);
> -
> -static void setup(void);
> -static void cleanup(void);
> -static void uid_verify(struct passwd *, struct passwd *, char *);
> -
> -int main(int ac, char **av)
> -{
> - int lc;
> -
> - tst_parse_opts(ac, av, NULL, NULL);
> -
> - setup();
> -
> - for (lc = 0; TEST_LOOPING(lc); lc++) {
> - int i, pid;
> -
> - tst_count = 0;
> -
> - if ((pid = FORK_OR_VFORK()) == -1) {
> - tst_brkm(TBROK, cleanup, "fork failed");
> - } else if (pid == 0) { /* child */
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < TST_TOTAL; i++) {
> -
> - /* Set the real or effective user id */
> - TEST(SETREUID(cleanup, *test_data[i].real_uid,
> - *test_data[i].eff_uid));
> -
> - if (TEST_RETURN != -1) {
> - tst_resm(TPASS, "setreuid(%d, %d) "
> - "succeeded as expected.",
> - *test_data[i].real_uid,
> - *test_data[i].eff_uid);
> - } else {
> - tst_resm(TFAIL, "setreuid(%d, %d) "
> - "did not return as expected.",
> - *test_data[i].real_uid,
> - *test_data[i].eff_uid);
> - }
> -
> - uid_verify(test_data[i].exp_real_usr,
> - test_data[i].exp_eff_usr,
> - test_data[i].test_msg);
> - }
> - tst_exit();
> - } else { /* parent */
> - tst_record_childstatus(cleanup, pid);
> - }
> - }
> - cleanup();
> - tst_exit();
> -}
> + uid_t *exp_real_uid;
> + uid_t *exp_eff_uid;
> +} tcases[] = {
> + {&neg_one, &neg_one, &root_uid, &root_uid},
> + {&nobody_uid, &nobody_uid, &nobody_uid, &nobody_uid}
> +};
I think further cleanup is possible here. We only have one test case so
we don't need this struct or an array. We certainly don't need a struct
of pointers. We don't need constants like "neg_one".
--
Thank you,
Richard.
More information about the ltp
mailing list