[LTP] [PATCH v4] Add PATH to tst_rhost_run.sh

[Petr Vorel]

> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 09:26:13AM +0100, Petr Vorel wrote:
> > Hi Wei, all,

> > I at least once reproduced the problem:
> > # ./tst_rhost_run.sh
> > RTNETLINK answers: File exists
> > tst_rhost_run 1 TBROK: ip li add name ltp_ns_veth1 type veth peer name ltp_ns_veth2 failed

> > I can't reproduce it now, let's skip it.

> > Unfortunately there is another problem, which can't be solved with adjusting
> > PATH for the test, because also remote end would need to have PATH adjusted
> > With this patch and with your another patch [1]:

> > # ./tst_rhost_run.sh
> > ...
> > tst_rhost_run 1 TINFO: tst_rhost_run: cmd: tst_net_iface_prefix -r 10.0.0.1
> > tst_rhost_run 1 TINFO: NETNS: ns_exec 17258 net,mnt sh -c " tst_net_iface_prefix -r 10.0.0.1 || echo RTERR" 2>&1
> > ./../../../..//testcases/lib/tst_net.sh: line 1027: sh:: command not found
> > tst_rhost_run 1 TINFO: tst_rhost_run: cmd: tst_net_iface_prefix -r fd00:1:1:1::1
> > tst_rhost_run 1 TINFO: NETNS: ns_exec 17258 net,mnt sh -c " tst_net_iface_prefix -r fd00:1:1:1::1 || echo RTERR" 2>&1
> > ./../../../..//testcases/lib/tst_net.sh: line 1032: sh:: command not found
> > ...
> > tst_rhost_run 1 TPASS: tst_rhost_run is working

> > => test claims TPASS, but it actually does not work properly (false negative).

> > Therefore instead of adjusting PATH I want to fix it properly, i.e. moving
> > to testcases/kernel/containers/share/ (described previously).

> > Kind regards,
> > Petr

> > [1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/ltp/patch/20230117040132.5245-1-wegao@suse.com/

> Your failed case already not related my patch already since failed show "sh:: command not found", could you help check env such as
> "which sh" ,  "sh" normally should work in default system PATH, no need add specific PATH.

> But yes the test case claim PASS is wrong so we can further make improvement on this kind of error, such as add further check 
> for "sh" command then we will exit case and make result failed. I can add more check for "sh" command.

I thought "sh:: command not found" is for command missing (tst_net_iface_prefix
is actually missing), but probably not. But I also think that it's not related
to sh is missing, because the message has 'sh::' (double colon).

Anyway, I really think to concentrate on this broken test should come after
tst_net.sh cleanup is merged and netns helpers are moved to testcases/lib/.
1) These things are needed not just for shake of test 2) That will allow not to
add code which will be removed after cleanup.

Kind regards,
Petr