[LTP] [PATCH 1/1] write05: Simplify test using TST_ macros

[Petr Vorel]

> Hi Petr,

> On Friday, July 21, 2023 3:33:30 PM IST Petr Vorel wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
> > ---
> >  testcases/kernel/syscalls/write/write05.c | 20 +++-----------------
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

> > diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/write/write05.c
> > b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/write/write05.c index c1e48f1df..1e85cce6d
> > 100644
> > --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/write/write05.c
> > +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/write/write05.c
> > @@ -59,26 +59,12 @@ static void verify_write(unsigned int i)

> >  	sigpipe_cnt = 0;

> > -	TEST(write(*tc->fd, *tc->buf, tc->size));
> > -
> > -	if (TST_RET != -1) {
> > -		tst_res(TFAIL, "write() succeeded unexpectedly");
> > -		return;
> > -	}
> > -
> > -	if (TST_ERR != tc->exp_errno) {
> > -		tst_res(TFAIL | TTERRNO,
> > -			"write() failed unexpectedly, expected %s",
> > -			tst_strerrno(tc->exp_errno));
> > +	TST_EXP_FAIL(write(*tc->fd, *tc->buf, tc->size), tc->exp_errno);
> Should we use TST_EXP_FAIL2 instead?

Good catch, write() requires TST_EXP_FAIL2(). Thanks!
Merged with this fix.

> Maybe we can also do the ascii doc changes and headers cleanup, but I'm fine if 
> we do that in a separate patch.

I dared to merge this before without a review as it's simple (bad habit).
Generally, the best approach (which I not always follow) is to separate changes.
That's why I usually add docparse change as a separate commit. But I usually
update copyright with other changes (that's really minor change).

> Reviewed-by: Avinesh Kumar <akumar@suse.de>


Kind regards,
Petr


> Regards,
> Avinesh