[LTP] [PATCH 0/2] Improve ioprio tests
Niklas Cassel
Niklas.Cassel@wdc.com
Tue Jun 20 11:16:48 CEST 2023
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 11:13:16AM +0200, Petr Vorel wrote:
> Hi Damien,
>
> > The ioprio syscall tests rely on ltp internal definitions of the
> > IOPRIO_XXX() macro defining priority classes and levels. With changes
> > to the ioprio API to support command duration limits, these internal
> > definitions are incomplete, causing test case ioprio_set03 to fail.
>
> > Avoid this issue by having the iprio tests use the kernel header file
> > definitions if that header exists. This enables additional checks in
> > the header file [1] which restores the expected results with test
> > ioprio_set03.
>
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20230530061307.525644-1-dlemoal@kernel.org/
>
> > Note: a review of this patch on the kernel block mailing list would be
> > very appreciated.
>
> I haven't found this patchset on https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/,
> did you send it there?
Hello Petr,
The patch series for LTP can be found here:
https://lore.kernel.org/ltp/20230608005315.3703446-1-dlemoal@kernel.org/T/#t
I just checked LTP master, and it hasn't been applied by the
LTP maintainers yet.
Kind regards,
Niklas
More information about the ltp
mailing list