[LTP] [linux-next:master] [scsi] eca2040972: ltp.ioprio_set03.fail

[Damien Le Moal]

On 6/22/23 16:32, Petr Vorel wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 02:47:43PM +0200, Cyril Hrubis wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>>> kernel test robot noticed "ltp.ioprio_set03.fail" on:
> 
>>>> LTP maintainers,
> 
>>>> Patches have been submitted to fix this issue. Were these patches applied ?
> 
>>> Looks like they are in, at least these two:
> 
>>>     ioprio: use ioprio.h kernel header if it exists
>>>     ioprio: Use IOPRIO_PRIO_NUM to check prio range
> 
>>> And there does not seem to be anything ioprio related haning in the LTP
>>> patchwork.
> 
> Hi Niklas,
> 
>> Hello Cyril, Petr, Damien,
> 
> 
>> I just ran LTP master + linux-next and the test case passes for me.
> 
> 
>> Although, note that even if you are using LTP master,
>> the way that the LTP header:
>> testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioprio/ioprio.h
>> is written, you will need to run
> 
>> make headers_install
>> with linux-next kernel source,
> 
>> before running
>> make autotools && ./configure
>> in LTP.
> 
>> Otherwise LTP will use the kernel uapi headers from your distro,
>> which does not perform the new checks for the IOPRIO_PRIO_VALUE()
>> macro. (It requires linux uapi headers from linux-next.)
> 
> Yes, it should do otherwise more tests would be often broken.
> 
> 
>> Does the linux kernel test robot not run
>> make headers_install
>> before running
>> make autotools && ./configure
>> in LTP?
> 
> I guess that's the question for Damien (I and Cyril have nothing to do with
> kernel test robot). I wonder myself.

Sorry, but I have nothing to do with the kernel robot either. I am only acting
when I get notified of a problem due to one of my patches.

-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research