[LTP] [PATCH v4] kill01: New case cgroup kill

[Li Wang]

Hi Wei,

The new test generally looks good to me.

I'm thinking maybe we make use of guarded buffers which could
remove the setup/cleanup function then. And doing memset(buf,...)
before reading into buf[] is quite necessary, to avoid someone
running this test with parameter '-i N' that the buf[] is polluted
by the first time.

https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/blob/master/doc/c-test-api.txt#L1799

<https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/blob/master/doc/c-test-api.txt#L1799>
e.g.

--- a/testcases/kernel/controllers/kill/kill01.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/controllers/kill/kill01.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@

 #define MAX_PID_NUM 100
 #define pid_num MIN(MAX_PID_NUM, (tst_ncpus_available() + 1))
-#define buf_len (20 * pid_num)
+#define buf_len (10 * MAX_PID_NUM)

 static char *buf;
 static struct tst_cg_group *cg_child_test_simple;
@@ -60,7 +60,6 @@ static void child_fn(void)

        while (getppid() == ppid)
                usleep(1000);
-
 }

 static int cg_run_nowait(const struct tst_cg_group *const cg,
@@ -82,6 +81,8 @@ static int cg_wait_for_proc_count(const struct
tst_cg_group *cg, int count)
        int attempts;
        char *ptr;

+       memset(buf, 0, buf_len);
+
        for (attempts = 100; attempts >= 0; attempts--) {
                int nr = 0;

@@ -121,23 +122,14 @@ static void run(void)
        cg_child_test_simple = tst_cg_group_rm(cg_child_test_simple);
 }

-static void setup(void)
-{
-       buf = SAFE_MALLOC(buf_len);
-       memset(buf, 0, buf_len);
-}
-
-static void cleanup(void)
-{
-       free(buf);
-}
-
 static struct tst_test test = {
        .test_all = run,
-       .setup = setup,
-       .cleanup = cleanup,
        .forks_child = 1,
        .max_runtime = 15,
        .needs_cgroup_ctrls = (const char *const []){ "memory", NULL },
        .needs_cgroup_ver = TST_CG_V2,
+       .bufs = (struct tst_buffers []) {
+               {&buf, .size = buf_len},
+               {}
+       }
 };

Anyway this version you could add my reviewed-by:

Reviewed-by: Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com>


-- 
Regards,
Li Wang