[LTP] [PATCH v1 1/2] ptrace05: Refactor the test using new LTP API
Richard Palethorpe
rpalethorpe@suse.de
Tue Nov 28 09:57:57 CET 2023
Hello,
Wei Gao via ltp <ltp@lists.linux.it> writes:
> Signed-off-by: Wei Gao <wegao@suse.com>
> ---
> testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace05.c | 147 ++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 108 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace05.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace05.c
> index 54cfa4d7b..4904b959c 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace05.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace05.c
> @@ -1,122 +1,67 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> /*
> - ******************************************************************************
> - *
> - * ptrace05 - an app which ptraces itself as per arbitrarily specified signals,
> - * over a user specified range.
> - *
> - * Copyright (C) 2009, Ngie Cooper
> - *
> - * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> - * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> - * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
> - * (at your option) any later version.
> - *
> - * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> - * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> - * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> - * GNU General Public License for more details.
> + * Copyright (C) 2009, Ngie Cooper
> + * Copyright (c) 2023 Wei Gao <wegao@suse.com>
> + */
> +
> +/*\
> + * [Description]
> *
> - * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along
> - * with this program; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, Inc.,
> - * 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA.
> + * ptrace05 - an app which ptraces itself as per arbitrarily specified signals
> *
> - ******************************************************************************
> */
>
> -#include <sys/types.h>
> -#include <sys/wait.h>
> -#include <signal.h>
> -#include <errno.h>
> -#include <libgen.h>
> -#include <math.h>
> #include <stdlib.h>
> -#include <stdio.h>
> -#include <string.h>
> -#include <unistd.h>
> -
> #include <config.h>
> #include "ptrace.h"
>
> -#include "test.h"
> #include "lapi/signal.h"
> +#include "tst_test.h"
>
> -char *TCID = "ptrace05";
> -int TST_TOTAL = 0;
> -
> -int usage(const char *);
> -
> -int usage(const char *argv0)
> -{
> - fprintf(stderr, "usage: %s [start-signum] [end-signum]\n", argv0);
> - return 1;
> -}
> -
> -int main(int argc, char **argv)
> +static void run(void)
> {
>
> - int end_signum = -1;
> - int signum;
> - int start_signum = -1;
> + int end_signum = SIGRTMAX;
> + int signum = 0;
> + int start_signum = 0;
> int status;
{start,end}_signum don't appear to serve a purpose anymore.
>
> pid_t child;
>
> - tst_parse_opts(argc, argv, NULL, NULL);
> -
> - if (start_signum == -1) {
> - start_signum = 0;
> - }
> - if (end_signum == -1) {
> - end_signum = SIGRTMAX;
> - }
> -
> for (signum = start_signum; signum <= end_signum; signum++) {
>
> - if (signum >= __SIGRTMIN && signum < SIGRTMIN)
> - continue;
Why can this be removed?
I remember we had an issue on some systems because some signals are
reserved by libc.
> -
> - switch (child = fork()) {
> + switch (child = SAFE_FORK()) {
> case -1:
> - tst_brkm(TBROK | TERRNO, NULL, "fork() failed");
> + tst_brk(TBROK | TERRNO, "fork() failed");
> case 0:
>
> - if (ptrace(PTRACE_TRACEME, 0, NULL, NULL) != -1) {
> - tst_resm(TINFO, "[child] Sending kill(.., %d)",
> - signum);
> - if (kill(getpid(), signum) < 0) {
> - tst_resm(TINFO | TERRNO,
> - "[child] kill(.., %d) failed.",
> - signum);
> - }
> + TEST(ptrace(PTRACE_TRACEME, 0, NULL, NULL));
> + if (TST_RET != -1) {
> + tst_res(TINFO, "[child] Sending kill(.., %d)",
> + signum);
> + SAFE_KILL(getpid(), signum);
> } else {
> -
> - /*
> - * This won't increment the TST_COUNT var.
> - * properly, but it'll show up as a failure
> - * nonetheless.
> - */
> - tst_resm(TFAIL | TERRNO,
> + tst_brk(TFAIL | TERRNO,
> "Failed to ptrace(PTRACE_TRACEME, ...) "
> "properly");
> -
> }
> - /* Shouldn't get here if signum == 0. */
> - exit((signum == 0 ? 0 : 2));
> +
> + exit(0);
> break;
>
> default:
>
> - waitpid(child, &status, 0);
> + SAFE_WAITPID(child, &status, 0);
>
> switch (signum) {
> case 0:
> if (WIFEXITED(status)
> && WEXITSTATUS(status) == 0) {
> - tst_resm(TPASS,
> + tst_res(TPASS,
> "kill(.., 0) exited "
> "with 0, as expected.");
> } else {
> - tst_resm(TFAIL,
> + tst_brk(TFAIL | TERRNO,
> "kill(.., 0) didn't exit "
> "with 0.");
> }
> @@ -125,20 +70,20 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> if (WIFSIGNALED(status)) {
> /* SIGKILL must be uncatchable. */
> if (WTERMSIG(status) == SIGKILL) {
> - tst_resm(TPASS,
> + tst_res(TPASS,
> "Killed with SIGKILL, "
> "as expected.");
> } else {
> - tst_resm(TPASS,
> + tst_brk(TFAIL | TERRNO,
> "Didn't die with "
> "SIGKILL (?!) ");
> }
> } else if (WIFEXITED(status)) {
> - tst_resm(TFAIL,
> + tst_brk(TFAIL | TERRNO,
> "Exited unexpectedly instead "
> "of dying with SIGKILL.");
> } else if (WIFSTOPPED(status)) {
> - tst_resm(TFAIL,
> + tst_brk(TFAIL | TERRNO,
> "Stopped instead of dying "
> "with SIGKILL.");
> }
> @@ -146,35 +91,21 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> /* All other processes should be stopped. */
> default:
> if (WIFSTOPPED(status)) {
> - tst_resm(TPASS, "Stopped as expected");
> + tst_res(TPASS, "Stopped as expected");
> } else {
> - tst_resm(TFAIL, "Didn't stop as "
> + tst_brk(TFAIL | TERRNO, "Didn't stop as "
> "expected.");
> - if (kill(child, 0)) {
> - tst_resm(TINFO,
> - "Is still alive!?");
> - } else if (WIFEXITED(status)) {
> - tst_resm(TINFO,
> - "Exited normally");
> - } else if (WIFSIGNALED(status)) {
> - tst_resm(TINFO,
> - "Was signaled with "
> - "signum=%d",
> - WTERMSIG(status));
> - }
> -
> }
> -
> break;
> -
> }
> -
> }
> - /* Make sure the child dies a quick and painless death ... */
> - kill(child, 9);
>
> + if (signum != 0 && signum != 9)
> + SAFE_PTRACE(PTRACE_CONT, child, NULL, NULL);
nit; it's clearer to write SIGKILL than 9 also some other signals change
number between platforms.
> }
> -
> - tst_exit();
> -
> }
> +
> +static struct tst_test test = {
> + .test_all = run,
> + .forks_child = 1,
> +};
> --
> 2.35.3
--
Thank you,
Richard.
More information about the ltp
mailing list