[LTP] [PATCH v2 3/4] syscalls: accept: Add tst_fd test

[Cyril Hrubis]

Hi!
> >  int invalid_socketfd = 400; /* anything that is not an open file */
> > -int devnull_fd;
> >  int socket_fd;
> >  int udp_fd;
> >  
> > @@ -45,10 +44,6 @@ static struct test_case {
> >  		(struct sockaddr *)&fsin1, sizeof(fsin1), EBADF,
> >  		"bad file descriptor"
> >  	},
> > -	{
> > -		PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0, &devnull_fd, (struct sockaddr *)&fsin1,
> > -		sizeof(fsin1), ENOTSOCK, "fd is not socket"
> > -	},
> >  	{
> >  		PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0, &socket_fd, (struct sockaddr *)3,
> >  		sizeof(fsin1), EINVAL, "invalid socket buffer"
> > @@ -73,8 +68,6 @@ static void test_setup(void)
> >  	sin0.sin_port = 0;
> >  	sin0.sin_addr.s_addr = INADDR_ANY;
> >  
> > -	devnull_fd = SAFE_OPEN("/dev/null", O_WRONLY);
> > -
> >  	socket_fd = SAFE_SOCKET(PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
> >  	SAFE_BIND(socket_fd, (struct sockaddr *)&sin0, sizeof(sin0));
> >  
> > @@ -88,7 +81,6 @@ static void test_setup(void)
> >  
> >  static void test_cleanup(void)
> >  {
> > -	SAFE_CLOSE(devnull_fd);
> >  	SAFE_CLOSE(socket_fd);
> >  	SAFE_CLOSE(udp_fd);
> >  }
> 
> Is this supposed to be part of the patchset?
> 
> I don't mind, but if we are strict, it should be in another commit.

That removes ENOTSOCK test that is now handled in accept03, I suppose I
should have explained that better in the comit message.

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz