[LTP] 回复: [PATCH 2/3] umount02: Simplify test using TST_ macros
Yang Xu (Fujitsu)
xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com
Thu Oct 26 07:40:30 CEST 2023
>> Signed-off-by: Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>> testcases/kernel/syscalls/umount/umount02.c | 12 +++---------
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/umount/umount02.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/umount/umount02.c
>> index 34a38c998..40fed1fbd 100644
>> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/umount/umount02.c
>> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/umount/umount02.c
>> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
>> /*
>> * Copyright (c) Wipro Technologies Ltd, 2002. All Rights Reserved.
>> * Copyright (c) 2014 Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
>> + * Copyright (c) Linux Test Project, 2003-2023
>> * Author: Nirmala Devi Dhanasekar <nirmala.devi@wipro.com>
>> *
>> * Check for basic errors returned by umount(2) system call.
>> @@ -41,21 +42,14 @@ static void verify_umount(unsigned int n)
>> {
>> struct tcase *tc = &tcases[n];
>> - TEST(umount(tc->mntpoint));
>> -
>> - if (TST_RET != -1) {
>> - tst_res(TFAIL, "umount() succeeds unexpectedly");
>> - return;
>> - }
>> + TST_EXP_FAIL(umount(tc->mntpoint), tc->exp_errno,
>> + "umount() fail with %s", tc->err_desc);
>I'd prefer just:
>TST_EXP_FAIL(umount(tc->mntpoint), tc->exp_errno);
OK. Thanks for your suggestion.
>> if (tc->exp_errno != TST_ERR) {
>> tst_res(TFAIL | TTERRNO, "umount() should fail with %s",
>> tst_strerrno(tc->exp_errno));
>> return;
>> }
>Also this is redundant and should be removed.
>With it removed you may add:
>Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
>nit: #include <string.h> could be removed.
>Also doc could be converted to docparse.
OK.
>Kind regards,
>Petr
Best Regards
Yang Xu
________________________________
发件人: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
发送时间: 2023年10月26日 8:12
收件人: Xu, Yang/徐 杨 <xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com>
抄送: ltp@lists.linux.it <ltp@lists.linux.it>
主题: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 2/3] umount02: Simplify test using TST_ macros
> Signed-off-by: Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com>
> ---
> testcases/kernel/syscalls/umount/umount02.c | 12 +++---------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/umount/umount02.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/umount/umount02.c
> index 34a38c998..40fed1fbd 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/umount/umount02.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/umount/umount02.c
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
> /*
> * Copyright (c) Wipro Technologies Ltd, 2002. All Rights Reserved.
> * Copyright (c) 2014 Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
> + * Copyright (c) Linux Test Project, 2003-2023
> * Author: Nirmala Devi Dhanasekar <nirmala.devi@wipro.com>
> *
> * Check for basic errors returned by umount(2) system call.
> @@ -41,21 +42,14 @@ static void verify_umount(unsigned int n)
> {
> struct tcase *tc = &tcases[n];
> - TEST(umount(tc->mntpoint));
> -
> - if (TST_RET != -1) {
> - tst_res(TFAIL, "umount() succeeds unexpectedly");
> - return;
> - }
> + TST_EXP_FAIL(umount(tc->mntpoint), tc->exp_errno,
> + "umount() fail with %s", tc->err_desc);
I'd prefer just:
TST_EXP_FAIL(umount(tc->mntpoint), tc->exp_errno);
> if (tc->exp_errno != TST_ERR) {
> tst_res(TFAIL | TTERRNO, "umount() should fail with %s",
> tst_strerrno(tc->exp_errno));
> return;
> }
Also this is redundant and should be removed.
With it removed you may add:
Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
nit: #include <string.h> could be removed.
Also doc could be converted to docparse.
Kind regards,
Petr
More information about the ltp
mailing list