[LTP] [PATCH] Add hugemmap41(Migrating the libhugetlbfs/testcases/slbpacaflush.c test)

[Shirisha ganta]

On Mon, 2024-02-19 at 23:18 +0100, Petr Vorel wrote:
> Hi Shirisha,
> 
> > +void check_online_cpus(int online_cpus[], int nr_cpus_needed)
> > +{
> > +	char cpu_state, path_buf[64];
> > +	int total_cpus, cpu_idx, fd, ret, i;
> > +
> > +	total_cpus = get_nprocs_conf();
> > +	cpu_idx = 0;
> > +
> > +	if (get_nprocs() < nr_cpus_needed)
> > +		tst_res(TFAIL, "Atleast online %d cpus are required",
> > nr_cpus_needed);
> s/Atleast/At least/
> (or better: "minimum %d online cpus" ..., but I'm not a native
> speaker.)
will take care in V2
> 
> Also test should exit when not enough online CPU, right? (it's a test
> requirement not a subject of testing). Therefore tst_brk(TCONF, ...)
> should be
> used instead of tst_res(TFAIL).
will take care in V2
> 
> And shouldn't this be a setup function (i.e. run only once, before
> test starts -
> test itself can be run more times, eg 3x with -i3).
I think not because of successive iterations the online cpus state
might change
> 
> > +
> > +	for (i = 0; i < total_cpus && cpu_idx < nr_cpus_needed; i++) {
> > +		errno = 0;
> > +		sprintf(path_buf, SYSFS_CPU_ONLINE_FMT, i);
> > +		fd = open(path_buf, O_RDONLY);
> > +		if (fd < 0) {
> > +			/* If 'online' is absent, the cpu cannot be
> > offlined */
> > +			if (errno == ENOENT) {
> > +				online_cpus[cpu_idx] = i;
> > +				cpu_idx++;
> > +				continue;
> > +			} else {
> > +				tst_res(TFAIL, "Unable to open %s: %s",
> > path_buf,
> > +				     strerror(errno));
> > +			}
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		ret = read(fd, &cpu_state, 1);
> > +		if (ret < 1)
> > +			tst_res(TFAIL, "Unable to read %s: %s",
> > path_buf,
> > +			     strerror(errno));
> > +
> > +		if (cpu_state == '1') {
> > +			online_cpus[cpu_idx] = i;
> > +			cpu_idx++;
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		if (fd >= 0)
> > +			SAFE_CLOSE(fd);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	if (cpu_idx < nr_cpus_needed)
> > +		tst_res(TFAIL, "Atleast %d online cpus were not found",
> > nr_cpus_needed);
> Also here tst_brk(TCONF, ...)
will take care in V2
> > +}
> 
> Kind regards,
> Petr