[LTP] [linus:master] [pidfd] cb12fd8e0d: ltp.readahead01.fail

[Petr Vorel]

Hi,

> On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 03:49:03PM +0100, Cyril Hrubis wrote:
> > Hi!
> > > So I'd just remove that test. It's meaningless for pseudo fses.

> > Wouldn't it make more sense to actually return EINVAL instead of
> > ignoring the request if readahead() is not implemented?

> It would change the return value for a whole bunch of stuff. I'm not
> sure that wouldn't cause regressions but is in any case a question for
> the readahead maintainers. For now I'd just remove that test for pidfds
> imho.

@Matthew, any input on Cyril's question please?

Kind regards,
Petr