[LTP] [PATCH] syscalls/mlock05: add mlock test for locking and pre-faulting of memory
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
Mon Apr 29 12:00:18 CEST 2024
Hi!
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> +/*
> + * Copyright Red Hat
> + * Author: Filippo Storniolo <fstornio@redhat.com>
> + */
> +
> +/*\
> + * [Description]
> + *
> + * Verify mlock() causes pre-faulting of PTEs and prevent memory to be swapped out.
> + *
> + * Checks the variables VmRSS and VmLck in /proc/$pid/status after the
> + * mlock syscall:
> + * - VmRSS size should be at least as big as the memory allocation
> + * - VmLck size should be equal to the size of the memory allocation
> + */
> +
> +#include "tst_test.h"
> +
> +#define MMAPLEN (1UL<<20)
> +
> +static void verify_mlock(void)
> +{
> + unsigned long VmRSS_before;
> + unsigned long VmRSS_after;
> + unsigned long VmLck_before;
> + unsigned long VmLck_after;
> + unsigned long VmRSS;
> + unsigned long VmLck;
> + char *buf;
> +
> + buf = SAFE_MMAP(NULL, MMAPLEN, PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0);
> +
> + SAFE_FILE_LINES_SCANF("/proc/self/status", "VmRSS: %lu", &VmRSS_before);
> + SAFE_FILE_LINES_SCANF("/proc/self/status", "VmLck: %lu", &VmLck_before);
> +
> + SAFE_MLOCK(buf, MMAPLEN);
> +
> + SAFE_FILE_LINES_SCANF("/proc/self/status", "VmRSS: %lu", &VmRSS_after);
> + SAFE_FILE_LINES_SCANF("/proc/self/status", "VmLck: %lu", &VmLck_after);
> +
> + VmRSS = VmRSS_after - VmRSS_before;
> + VmLck = VmLck_after - VmLck_before;
> +
> + // Convertion from KiB to B
> + VmRSS *= 1024;
> + VmLck *= 1024;
> +
> + if (VmRSS >= MMAPLEN) {
> + tst_res(TPASS, "Pre-allocation functionality of mlock() successful");
> + } else {
> + tst_brk(TBROK, "Expected pre-allocation of %lu bytes, "
> + "get %lu pre-allocated", MMAPLEN, VmRSS);
This is TFAIL. TBROK is used when a test is broken because a test setup
has failed, not when test a assertion wasn't true.
Also simplify this to TST_EXP_EXPR(VmRSS >= MMAPLEN);
> + }
> +
> + if (VmLck == MMAPLEN) {
> + tst_res(TPASS, "Locking functionality of mlock() successful");
> + } else {
> + tst_brk(TBROK, "Expected locking of %lu bytes, "
> + "get %lu locked", MMAPLEN, VmLck);
> + }
This could be simplified to a single TST_EXP_EQ_LU(VmLCK, MMAPLEN);
> + SAFE_MUNLOCK(buf, MMAPLEN);
> + SAFE_MUNMAP(buf, MMAPLEN);
> +}
> +
> +static struct tst_test test = {
> + .test_all = verify_mlock,
> +};
The rest looks good.
--
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
More information about the ltp
mailing list