[LTP] [PATCh v2] loop: Increase bsize variable from unsigned short to unsigned int

Li Wang liwang@redhat.com
Tue Aug 27 13:59:16 CEST 2024


On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 4:41 PM John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> On 27/08/2024 09:17, Li Wang wrote:
> > This change allows the loopback driver to handle block size larger than
> > PAGE_SIZE and increases the consistency of data types used within the driver.
> > Especially to match the struct queue_limits.logical_block_size type.
> >
> > Also, this is to get rid of the LTP/ioctl_loop06 test failure:
> >
> >    12 ioctl_loop06.c:76: TINFO: Using LOOP_SET_BLOCK_SIZE with arg > PAGE_SIZE
> >    13 ioctl_loop06.c:59: TFAIL: Set block size succeed unexpectedly
> >    ...
> >    18 ioctl_loop06.c:76: TINFO: Using LOOP_CONFIGURE with block_size > PAGE_SIZE
> >    19 ioctl_loop06.c:59: TFAIL: Set block size succeed unexpectedly
> >
> > Thoese fail due to the loop_reconfigure_limits() cast bsize to 'unsined short'
>
> these
>
> > that never gets an expected error when testing invalid logical block size,
> > which was just exposed since 6.11-rc1 introduced patches:
> >
> >    commit 9423c653fe61 ("loop: Don't bother validating blocksize")
> >    commit fe3d508ba95b ("block: Validate logical block size in blk_validate_limits()")
>
> Maybe it's better to add a fixes tag for original commit which
> introduced unsigned short usage.

I'm not sure that makes sense because at that moment loop_set_block_size
has a dedicated function blk_validate_block_size to validate bsize, after your
commit 9423c653fe61 optimize that then the problem appears.

  473516b36193 ("loop: use the atomic queue limits update API")


> Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>

Thanks for reviewing.


-- 
Regards,
Li Wang



More information about the ltp mailing list