[LTP] [PATCH] acct01: add EFAULT errno check.
Petr Vorel
pvorel@suse.cz
Mon Jul 8 06:23:18 CEST 2024
Hi
> Add EFAULT errno check in acct01 testcase.
> Signed-off-by: lufei <lufei@uniontech.com>
I guess you don't mind if I change this to following before merge:
Signed-off-by: Lu Fei <lufei@uniontech.com>
> ---
> testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct01.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct01.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct01.c
> index 1b53a32f2..ed1817bc5 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct01.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct01.c
> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
> #define FILE_TMPFILE "./tmpfile"
> #define FILE_ELOOP "test_file_eloop1"
> #define FILE_EROFS "ro_mntpoint/file"
> +#define FILE_EFAULT "/tmp/invalid/file/name"
And here I just amend to:
#define FILE_EFAULT "invalid/file/name"
(although it's very unlikely, the full patch *could* be existing, but not the
relative one, because LTP is creating unique temporary directory for each run,
e.g. /tmp/LTP_accTJpYqc.
> static struct passwd *ltpuser;
> @@ -45,6 +46,7 @@ static char *file_eloop;
> static char *file_enametoolong;
> static char *file_erofs;
> static char *file_null;
> +static char *file_efault;
> static void setup_euid(void)
> {
> @@ -56,6 +58,16 @@ static void cleanup_euid(void)
> SAFE_SETEUID(0);
> }
> +static void setup_emem(void)
> +{
> + file_efault = SAFE_MMAP(NULL, 1, PROT_NONE,
> + MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_PRIVATE, 0, 0);
> +}
> +static void cleanup_emem(void)
> +{
> + SAFE_MUNMAP(file_efault, 1);
> +}
> +
> static struct test_case {
> char **filename;
> char *desc;
> @@ -72,6 +84,7 @@ static struct test_case {
> {&file_eloop, FILE_ELOOP, ELOOP, NULL, NULL},
> {&file_enametoolong, "aaaa...", ENAMETOOLONG, NULL, NULL},
> {&file_erofs, FILE_EROFS, EROFS, NULL, NULL},
> + {&file_efault, FILE_EFAULT, EFAULT, setup_emem, cleanup_emem},
{&file_efault, "Invalid address", EFAULT, setup_emem, cleanup_emem},
(as Cyril suggested)
Actually this second version does only single thing (unlike the previous version
[1]), thus I suggest to merge it:
Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
Therefore I reopen it in patchwork [2].
And you can send warning cleanup after merging this?
Could you, please, next time put version to your patchset (e.g. -v2 for second
version), this help to avoid confusions?
Kind regards,
Petr
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/ltp/20240606065506.1686-1-lufei@uniontech.com/
[2] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/ltp/patch/20240624015245.54968-2-lufei@uniontech.com/
> };
> static void setup(void)
More information about the ltp
mailing list