[LTP] [PATCH v3 09/11] Add landlock04 test
Li Wang
liwang@redhat.com
Wed Jul 24 15:37:42 CEST 2024
On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 9:30 PM Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz> wrote:
> Hi Li, Andrea,
>
> > Hi Petr, Andrea,
> ...
> > > ...
> > > tst_supported_fs_types.c:97: TINFO: Kernel supports tmpfs
> > > tst_supported_fs_types.c:49: TINFO: mkfs is not needed for tmpfs
> > > tst_test.c:1746: TINFO: === Testing on ext2 ===
> > > tst_test.c:1111: TINFO: Formatting /dev/loop1 with ext2 opts='' extra
> > > opts=''
> > > mke2fs 1.47.0 (5-Feb-2023)
> > > tst_test.c:1123: TINFO: Mounting /dev/loop1 to
> /tmp/LTP_lant6WbKJ/sandbox
> > > fstyp=ext2 flags=0
> > > landlock_common.h:30: TINFO: Landlock ABI v3
> > > landlock04.c:151: TINFO: Testing LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_EXECUTE
> > > landlock04.c:123: TINFO: Enable read/exec permissions for
> > > /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
> > > landlock04.c:131: TBROK: landlock_add_rule(3, 1, 0xf7f13ff4, 0): EINVAL
> > > (22)
>
>
> > Possibly that's because the 'LANDLOCK_RULE_PATH_BENEATH' was
> > refactored from the v6.7 mainline kernel, so it can't add the rule
> correctly
> > with older kernels.
>
> > commit 0e0fc7e8eb4a11bd9f89a9c74bc7c0e144c56203
> > Author: Konstantin Meskhidze <konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com>
> > Date: Thu Oct 26 09:47:46 2023 +0800
>
> > landlock: Refactor landlock_add_rule() syscall
>
> > But this is my guess (through reading the code), I didn't do more to
> > verify that by installing such a kernel.
>
> Thanks, Li, for a hint. Quick test shows that it's working on 6.9.9, but
> broken
> with with 6.6.x or 6.5.x, also reproduced on more distros. I'll verify this
> specific commit, I suppose we should require 6.7, right?
>
I think YES, 6.7 includes some vital improvement on the landlock syscall.
--
Regards,
Li Wang
More information about the ltp
mailing list