[LTP] [PATCH v1] Rewritten symlink01 test

[Andrea Cervesato]

That’s a mess due to multiple patches vs. single patch set. I cherry-picked in b4 branch all previous single patches into one patch set, forgetting to update the symlink01.

I will fix it once I’m back from vacation.

Andrea

> On 26 Jul 2024, at 17:48, Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz> wrote:
> 
> Hi!
>> This test has been split and rewritten. Now it verifies the following
>> symlink() syscall features:
>> 
>> - symbolic link is created from a non-existing folder
>> - symbolic link is created from existing folder
>> - syscall raises EEXIST when symbolic link already exists
>> - syscall raises ENAMETOOLONG when path name is PATH_MAX long (or above)
> 
> I had a quick look at the status of this and it seems that there are
> still a few missing parts, namely:
> 
> $ git grep symlink01 runtest/
> 
> runtest/syscalls:chdir01A symlink01 -T chdir01
> runtest/syscalls:chmod01A symlink01 -T chmod01
> runtest/syscalls:link01 symlink01 -T link01
> runtest/syscalls:readlink01A symlink01 -T readlink01
> runtest/syscalls:rename01A symlink01 -T rename01
> runtest/syscalls:rmdir03A symlink01 -T rmdir03
> runtest/syscalls:symlink01 symlink01
> runtest/syscalls:unlink01 symlink01 -T unlink01
> 
> And the only patch apart from symlink01 conversion on patchwork seems to
> be rename15:
> 
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/ltp/patch/20240424092357.11207-1-andrea.cervesato@suse.de/
> 
> --
> Cyril Hrubis
> chrubis@suse.cz