[LTP] [PATCH] sched/starvation: Choose from available cpus
Wei Gao
wegao@suse.com
Thu Jun 6 01:39:31 CEST 2024
On Wed, Jun 05, 2024 at 06:05:36PM +0000, Edward Liaw via ltp wrote:
> Use the first available cpu in the sched_getaffinity set.
>
> This test was failing as a 32bit test for some arm architectures where
> cpu 0 does not support 32bit applications.
>
> Signed-off-by: Edward Liaw <edliaw@google.com>
> ---
> .../kernel/sched/cfs-scheduler/starvation.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/sched/cfs-scheduler/starvation.c b/testcases/kernel/sched/cfs-scheduler/starvation.c
> index eb9fd6ff5..e0ea30d19 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/sched/cfs-scheduler/starvation.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/sched/cfs-scheduler/starvation.c
> @@ -49,13 +49,28 @@ again:
> static void setup(void)
> {
> cpu_set_t mask;
> + int cpu = 0;
> + long ncpus = tst_ncpus_conf();
>
> CPU_ZERO(&mask);
>
> - CPU_SET(0, &mask);
> + /* Restrict test to a single cpu */
> + TST_EXP_POSITIVE(sched_getaffinity(0, sizeof(mask), &mask));
s/TST_EXP_POSITIVE/TST_EXP_PASS
> +
> + if (CPU_COUNT(&mask) == 0)
> + tst_brk(TCONF, "No cpus available");
I suppose this should a bug happen if cpu count is 0, so i suggest
s/TCONF/TBROK. What do you think?
> +
> + while (CPU_ISSET(cpu, &mask) == 0 && cpu < ncpus)
> + cpu++;
> +
> + CPU_ZERO(&mask);
> +
> + CPU_SET(cpu, &mask);
>
> TST_EXP_POSITIVE(sched_setaffinity(0, sizeof(mask), &mask));
s/TST_EXP_POSITIVE/TST_EXP_PASS
>
> + tst_res(TINFO, "Set affinity to CPU %d", cpu);
> +
> if (tst_parse_long(str_loop, &loop, 1, LONG_MAX))
> tst_brk(TBROK, "Invalid number of loop number '%s'", str_loop);
>
Others LGTM. Thanks for your nice patch!
> --
> 2.45.1.467.gbab1589fc0-goog
>
>
> --
> Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
More information about the ltp
mailing list