[LTP] [PATCH 0/2] lib: Add TINFO_WARN

Li Wang liwang@redhat.com
Thu Jun 20 10:05:13 CEST 2024


Hi Petr, All,

On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 1:36 PM Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz> wrote:

> > Hi!
> > > I'm not sure about this. Why not enabling TINFO + TWARN combination
> instead?
>
> > > tst_res(TINFO | TWARN, "my message");
>
> > That's even more confusing. Does that propagate into results or not?
>
> > To be honest we even have problem deciding if we should use TINFO or
> > TWARN in some cases and adding third variant would make things even
> > worse, sicne we would have three options.
>
> > So I would really keep just TINFO which is something that is printed by
> > default but does not propagate into results and TWARN that is printed as
> > well but propagates into results.
>
> > Maybe it would be even better to actually remove TWARN. That way we
> > would have only TFAIL and TBROK that propagate into results since TWARN
> > is kind of lesser TBROK anyways...
>
> Understand to your points. But tst_res TWARN is quite understandable
> (simple warning, which propagates), IMHO better to use than
> tst_res TBROK. But sure, feel free to go ahead and send a patch to remove
> TWARN.
>

+1 to remove TWARN.


> BTW I was also surprised how many tests use tst_resm TBROK ... /
> tst_resm(TBROK,
> ...) followed by exit 1 / exit(1). These should be converted to tst_brkm
> TBROK /
> tst_resm(TBROK, ...).
>
> Other thing is, that I would prefer to have macro for tst_res(TINFO,
> "WARNING: ...")
> e.g. WARNING(...) would produce tst_res(TINFO, "WARNING: ...") from simple
> point I
> don't like to hardwire text (there can be typos). BTW more than for this
> rare
> case I would prefer to have macros for .tags, e.g. LINUX_GIT(43a6684519ab)
> would
> produce {"linux-git", "43a6684519ab"} CVE(2017-2671) would produce {"CVE",
> "2017-2671"}
> (again, typos).
>

What about defining new LTP macros like
  TST_RES_TINFO(),
  TST_RES_TFAIL(),
  ...
  TST_RES_WARNING(),
so that we can save time on inputting the TFAIL/TINFO keywords every time?

also TST_LINUX_GIT(), TST_CVE() ?

-- 
Regards,
Li Wang


More information about the ltp mailing list