[LTP] [PATCH 0/2] lib: Add TINFO_WARN

[Petr Vorel]

Hi Li,

> Hi All,

> I come up with a way to define simple macros for all LTP print, especially
> for TFAIL
> we could make use of the GET_MACRO to select a specific macro implementation
> based on the number of arguments provided to a variadic macro.

> Something partly like:

> --- a/include/tst_test_macros.h
> +++ b/include/tst_test_macros.h
> @@ -368,4 +368,28 @@ const char *tst_errno_names(char *buf, const int
> *exp_errs, int exp_errs_cnt);
>  #define TST_EXP_EQ_SSZ(VAL_A, VAL_B) \
>                 TST_EXP_EQ_(VAL_A, #VAL_A, VAL_B, #VAL_B, ssize_t, "%zi")

> +/*TST_RES*/
> +#define TST_RES_TINFO(MESSAGE) \
> +       tst_res(TINFO, MESSAGE);
> +
> +#define TST_RES_TWARN(MESSAGE) \
> +       tst_res(TINFO, "WARNING "MESSAGE);
> +
> +#define TST_RES_TCONF(MESSAGE) \
> +       tst_res(TCONF, MESSAGE);
> +
> +#define TST_RES_TPASS(MESSAGE) \
> +       tst_res(TPASS, MESSAGE);
> +
> +#define TST_RES_TFAIL(...) \
> +           GET_MACRO(__VA_ARGS__, TST_RES_FAIL2,
> TST_RES_FAIL1)(__VA_ARGS__)
> +
> +#define GET_MACRO(_1, _2, NAME, ...) NAME
> +
> +#define TST_RES_FAIL1(MESSAGE) \
> +           tst_res(TFAIL, MESSAGE)
> +
> +#define TST_RES_FAIL2(flag, MESSAGE) \
> +           tst_res(TFAIL | flag, MESSAGE)
> +
>  #endif /* TST_TEST_MACROS_H__ */
> diff --git a/lib/newlib_tests/tst_res_macros.c
> b/lib/newlib_tests/tst_res_macros.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000..e16f3cbba
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/lib/newlib_tests/tst_res_macros.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2024 Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com>
> + */
> +
> +#include "tst_test.h"
> +#include "tst_res_flags.h"
> +#include "tst_test_macros.h"
> +
> +static void do_test(unsigned int i)
> +{
> +       TST_RES_TINFO("message");
> +       TST_RES_TPASS("message");
> +       TST_RES_TWARN("message");
> +       TST_RES_TFAIL("message");
> +       TST_RES_TFAIL(TERRNO, "message");
> +       TST_RES_TFAIL(TTERRNO, "message");
> +}
> +
> +static struct tst_test test = {
> +       .test_all = do_test,
> +};

Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
Thanks!

Kind regards,
Petr