[LTP] [PATCH v4 2/2] Add shmat04 SysV IPC bug reproducer
Andrea Cervesato
andrea.cervesato@suse.de
Mon Mar 4 16:21:19 CET 2024
From: Andrea Cervesato <andrea.cervesato@suse.com>
This is an LTP port of a SysV bug reproducer provided by Michal Hocko.
When debugging issues with a workload using SysV shmem, Michal Hocko has
come up with a reproducer that shows how a series of mprotect()
operations can result in an elevated shm_nattch and thus leak of the
resource.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Cervesato <andrea.cervesato@suse.com>
---
result of TST_EXP_EQ_LU() as test result
removed change_access
runtest/syscalls | 1 +
runtest/syscalls-ipc | 1 +
.../kernel/syscalls/ipc/shmat/.gitignore | 1 +
testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/shmat/shmat04.c | 92 +++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 95 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/shmat/shmat04.c
diff --git a/runtest/syscalls b/runtest/syscalls
index 7794f1465..cc0144379 100644
--- a/runtest/syscalls
+++ b/runtest/syscalls
@@ -1445,6 +1445,7 @@ setxattr03 setxattr03
shmat01 shmat01
shmat02 shmat02
shmat03 shmat03
+shmat04 shmat04
shmctl01 shmctl01
shmctl02 shmctl02
diff --git a/runtest/syscalls-ipc b/runtest/syscalls-ipc
index df41140a7..9860394de 100644
--- a/runtest/syscalls-ipc
+++ b/runtest/syscalls-ipc
@@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ semop03 semop03
shmat01 shmat01
shmat02 shmat02
+shmat04 shmat04
shmctl01 shmctl01
shmctl02 shmctl02
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/shmat/.gitignore b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/shmat/.gitignore
index 2b972f8f2..5600b2742 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/shmat/.gitignore
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/shmat/.gitignore
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
/shmat01
/shmat02
/shmat03
+/shmat04
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/shmat/shmat04.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/shmat/shmat04.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..adbb5a130
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/shmat/shmat04.c
@@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2024 SUSE LLC
+ * Author: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
+ * LTP port: Andrea Cervesato <andrea.cervesato@suse.com>
+ */
+
+/*\
+ * [Description]
+ *
+ * When debugging issues with a workload using SysV shmem, Michal Hocko has
+ * come up with a reproducer that shows how a series of mprotect()
+ * operations can result in an elevated shm_nattch and thus leak of the
+ * resource.
+ *
+ * The problem is caused by wrong assumptions in vma_merge() commit
+ * 714965ca8252 ("mm/mmap: start distinguishing if vma can be removed in
+ * mergeability test"). The shmem vmas have a vma_ops->close callback
+ * that decrements shm_nattch, and we remove the vma without calling it.
+ *
+ * Patch: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240222215930.14637-2-vbabka@suse.cz/
+ */
+
+#include "tst_test.h"
+#include "tst_safe_sysv_ipc.h"
+#include "libnewipc.h"
+
+static int segment_id = -1;
+static int key_id;
+static int page_size;
+static size_t segment_size;
+
+static void run(void)
+{
+ struct shmid_ds shmid_ds;
+ void *sh_mem;
+
+ segment_id = SAFE_SHMGET(
+ key_id,
+ segment_size,
+ IPC_CREAT | IPC_EXCL | 0600);
+
+ sh_mem = SAFE_SHMAT(segment_id, NULL, 0);
+
+ tst_res(TINFO, "Attached at %p. key: %d - size: %lu",
+ sh_mem, segment_id, segment_size);
+
+ SAFE_SHMCTL(segment_id, IPC_STAT, &shmid_ds);
+
+ tst_res(TINFO, "Number of attaches: %lu", shmid_ds.shm_nattch);
+
+ SAFE_MPROTECT(sh_mem + page_size, page_size, PROT_NONE);
+ SAFE_MPROTECT(sh_mem, 2 * page_size, PROT_WRITE);
+
+ SAFE_SHMCTL(segment_id, IPC_STAT, &shmid_ds);
+
+ tst_res(TINFO, "Number of attaches: %lu", shmid_ds.shm_nattch);
+ tst_res(TINFO, "Delete attached memory");
+
+ SAFE_SHMDT(sh_mem);
+ SAFE_SHMCTL(segment_id, IPC_STAT, &shmid_ds);
+
+ tst_res(TINFO, "Number of attaches: %lu", shmid_ds.shm_nattch);
+
+ SAFE_SHMCTL(segment_id, IPC_RMID, NULL);
+ segment_id = -1;
+
+ TST_EXP_EQ_LU(shmid_ds.shm_nattch, 0);
+}
+
+static void setup(void)
+{
+ key_id = GETIPCKEY();
+ page_size = getpagesize();
+
+ tst_res(TINFO, "Key id: %d", key_id);
+ tst_res(TINFO, "Page size: %d", page_size);
+
+ segment_size = 3 * page_size;
+}
+
+static void cleanup(void)
+{
+ if (segment_id != -1)
+ SAFE_SHMCTL(segment_id, IPC_RMID, NULL);
+}
+
+static struct tst_test test = {
+ .test_all = run,
+ .setup = setup,
+ .cleanup = cleanup,
+};
--
2.35.3
More information about the ltp
mailing list