[LTP] [PATCH v2 2/2] connect01: Add negative tests
Yang Xu
xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com
Tue May 14 06:51:10 CEST 2024
Add negative cases for connect(), when errno is EPROTOTYPE or EACCES
Signed-off-by: Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com>
---
testcases/kernel/syscalls/connect/connect01.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/connect/connect01.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/connect/connect01.c
index 52a6f154b..97d360482 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/connect/connect01.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/connect/connect01.c
@@ -18,19 +18,26 @@
#include "tst_test.h"
#include "lapi/syscalls.h"
+#define SOCK_FILE "sock_file"
+
+static struct passwd *pw;
+
static int fd_share;
static int fd_server;
static struct sockaddr_in sock1;
static struct sockaddr_in sock2;
static struct sockaddr_in sock3;
+static struct sockaddr_un sock4;
static pid_t pid;
static void setup1(unsigned int);
static void setup2(unsigned int);
static void setup3(unsigned int);
+static void setup4(unsigned int);
static void cleanup1(void);
+static void cleanup2(void);
static struct test_case_t {
int domain;
@@ -64,6 +71,12 @@ static struct test_case_t {
{PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0, (struct sockaddr *)&sock3,
sizeof(sock3), EAFNOSUPPORT, setup2, cleanup1,
"address doesn't have the correct address family in sa_family"},
+ {AF_UNIX, SOCK_DGRAM, 0, (struct sockaddr *)&sock4,
+ sizeof(sock4), EPROTOTYPE, setup4, cleanup2,
+ "socket type does not support the protocol"},
+ {AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0, (struct sockaddr *)&sock4,
+ sizeof(sock4), EACCES, setup4, cleanup2,
+ "write permission is denied on the socket file"},
};
static int sys_connect(int sockfd, const struct sockaddr *addr,
@@ -145,6 +158,11 @@ static void setup(void)
sock3.sin_family = 47;
sock3.sin_port = 0;
sock3.sin_addr.s_addr = htonl(0x0AFFFEFD);
+
+ sock4.sun_family = AF_UNIX;
+ strncpy(sock4.sun_path, SOCK_FILE, sizeof(sock4.sun_path));
+
+ pw = SAFE_GETPWNAM("nobody");
}
static void setup1(unsigned int i)
@@ -170,21 +188,53 @@ static void setup3(unsigned int i)
SAFE_CONNECT(fd_server, (const struct sockaddr *)&sock1, sizeof(sock1));
}
+static void setup4(unsigned int i)
+{
+ struct test_case_t *tc = &tcases[i];
+
+ fd_share = SAFE_SOCKET(tc->domain, tc->type, tc->proto);
+ fd_server = SAFE_SOCKET(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
+ SAFE_BIND(fd_server, tc->sockaddr, tc->salen);
+ SAFE_LISTEN(fd_server, 5);
+}
+
static void cleanup1(void)
{
if (fd_share > 0)
SAFE_CLOSE(fd_share);
}
+static void cleanup2(void)
+{
+ if (fd_share > 0)
+ SAFE_CLOSE(fd_share);
+ if (fd_server > 0)
+ SAFE_CLOSE(fd_server);
+ SAFE_UNLINK(SOCK_FILE);
+}
+
static void verify_connect(unsigned int i)
{
struct test_case_t *tc = &tcases[i];
+ pid_t pid_child;
start_server(&sock1);
if (tc->setup)
tc->setup(i);
- TST_EXP_FAIL(sys_connect(fd_share, tc->sockaddr, tc->salen),
- tc->exp_errno, "%s", tc->desc);
+ if (tc->exp_errno == EACCES) {
+ pid_child = SAFE_FORK();
+ if (!pid_child) {
+ SAFE_SETUID(pw->pw_uid);
+ TST_EXP_FAIL(
+ sys_connect(fd_share, tc->sockaddr, tc->salen),
+ tc->exp_errno, "%s", tc->desc);
+ exit(0);
+ }
+ SAFE_WAITPID(pid_child, NULL, 0);
+ } else {
+ TST_EXP_FAIL(sys_connect(fd_share, tc->sockaddr, tc->salen),
+ tc->exp_errno, "%s", tc->desc);
+ }
SAFE_KILL(pid, SIGKILL);
SAFE_WAITPID(pid, NULL, 0);
if (tc->cleanup)
--
2.39.3
More information about the ltp
mailing list