[LTP] [PATCH 5/5] Add test for data integrity over NFS

Martin Doucha mdoucha@suse.cz
Wed Nov 13 15:02:59 CET 2024


On 12. 11. 24 22:40, Petr Vorel wrote:
>> On 02. 11. 24 0:32, Petr Vorel wrote:
>>> Hi Martin,
> 
>>> BTW I got timeout when testing nfs10.sh -v 4 -t tcp on Tumbleweed VM (2 CPU,
>>> 1.4 GB RAM, 2 GB SWAP) on my laptop:
>>> ...
> 
>>> The quickest way would be to use the same calculation (* $TST_CNT + 5% for spare
>>> time) in nfs10.sh and increase tst_set_timeout with.
> 
>> Yes, that is expected for now, we need to add separate timeouts for each
>> subtest, including per-filesystem.
> 
> Right, I suppose you post v2.
> 
> I wonder why you did not get timeouts on your laptop. I suppose calculation for
> fsplough was below 5 min, right?

I've tested nfs10.sh with LTP_TIMEOUT_MUL=2 which was enough to make it 
pass. The per-testcase timeout implementation needs to be a separate 
patch anyway so sending a v2 doesn't make sense at the moment. I can 
write the timeout patch but I'll need to figure out how the shell 
timeout works.

-- 
Martin Doucha   mdoucha@suse.cz
SW Quality Engineer
SUSE LINUX, s.r.o.
CORSO IIa
Krizikova 148/34
186 00 Prague 8
Czech Republic



More information about the ltp mailing list