[LTP] [PATCH 5/5] Add test for data integrity over NFS
Martin Doucha
mdoucha@suse.cz
Wed Nov 13 15:02:59 CET 2024
On 12. 11. 24 22:40, Petr Vorel wrote:
>> On 02. 11. 24 0:32, Petr Vorel wrote:
>>> Hi Martin,
>
>>> BTW I got timeout when testing nfs10.sh -v 4 -t tcp on Tumbleweed VM (2 CPU,
>>> 1.4 GB RAM, 2 GB SWAP) on my laptop:
>>> ...
>
>>> The quickest way would be to use the same calculation (* $TST_CNT + 5% for spare
>>> time) in nfs10.sh and increase tst_set_timeout with.
>
>> Yes, that is expected for now, we need to add separate timeouts for each
>> subtest, including per-filesystem.
>
> Right, I suppose you post v2.
>
> I wonder why you did not get timeouts on your laptop. I suppose calculation for
> fsplough was below 5 min, right?
I've tested nfs10.sh with LTP_TIMEOUT_MUL=2 which was enough to make it
pass. The per-testcase timeout implementation needs to be a separate
patch anyway so sending a v2 doesn't make sense at the moment. I can
write the timeout patch but I'll need to figure out how the shell
timeout works.
--
Martin Doucha mdoucha@suse.cz
SW Quality Engineer
SUSE LINUX, s.r.o.
CORSO IIa
Krizikova 148/34
186 00 Prague 8
Czech Republic
More information about the ltp
mailing list