[LTP] [PATCH 3/5] mq_timedsend01: Workaround segfault on libc variant on 32 bit
Petr Vorel
pvorel@suse.cz
Fri Nov 15 15:00:05 CET 2024
Hi Jan,
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 3:40 PM Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz> wrote:
> > EFAULT test segfaults on newer kernels (e.g. 6.4) on libc variant on
> > 32bit. Similarly to 1d4d5a0750 use typical LTP workaround to test by
> > forked child + checking the terminating signal.
...
> > +static void test_bad_addr(unsigned int i)
> > +{
> > + struct time64_variants *tv = &variants[tst_variant];
> > + pid_t pid;
> > + int status;
> > +
> > + pid = SAFE_FORK();
> > + if (!pid) {
> > + verify_mqt_send_receive(i, pid);
> > + _exit(0);
> > + }
> > +
> > + SAFE_WAITPID(pid, &status, 0);
> > +
> > + if (WIFEXITED(status) && !WEXITSTATUS(status))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + if (tv->ts_type == TST_LIBC_TIMESPEC &&
> > + WIFSIGNALED(status) && WTERMSIG(status) == SIGSEGV) {
> > + tst_res(TPASS, "Child killed by expected signal");
> > + return;
> > + }
> > +
> > + tst_res(TFAIL, "Child %s", tst_strstatus(status));
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void do_test(unsigned int i)
> > +{
> > + struct time64_variants *tv = &variants[tst_variant];
> > + const struct test_case *tc = &tcase[i];
> > + unsigned int j;
> > + pid_t pid = -1;
> > +
> > + tst_ts_set_sec(&ts, tc->tv_sec);
> > + tst_ts_set_nsec(&ts, tc->tv_nsec);
> > +
> > + if (tc->bad_ts_addr) {
> Would it make sense to run bad_msg_addr/EFAULT test also in child?
First, thanks a lot a review.
I'm not sure myself. So far it's not needed (problem is only with struct
timespec *abs_timeout not with const char msg_ptr[]). But OTOH it does not
harm. Doing this might prevent some failure in the future.
Kind regards,
Petr
> > + test_bad_addr(i);
> > + return;
> > + }
...
More information about the ltp
mailing list