[LTP] [PATCH v2 5/5] setsockopt0[38]: Use tst_is_compat_mode()

[Cyril Hrubis]

Hi!
> > I guess this is something that should be looked into after the release,
> > either we will need .needs_compat flag or relax the condtions...
> 
> Looking into this old patch, do we relax the conditions or use .needs_abi_bits = 32?
> setsockopt08.c prints only TINFO, thus !tst_is_compat_mode() would have to be
> used for the check.

I guess that doing:

	if (!tst_is_compat_mode())
		tst_res(TINFO, "The vunerability was only present in 32-bit compat mode");


Is a sensible approach. It does not hurt to run the test either way but
it makes it clear that the original CVE it's not going to be reproduced
without 32-bit compat mode.

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz