[LTP] [PATCH v2] rt_sigqueueinfo02: Add negative tests for rt_sigqueueinfo
Xinjian Ma (Fujitsu)
maxj.fnst@fujitsu.com
Thu Oct 10 07:55:58 CEST 2024
Hi
> Hi!
> > +static void child_do(void)
> > +{
> > + TST_CHECKPOINT_WAKE(0);
> > + TST_CHECKPOINT_WAIT(1);
>
> This still has the wake/wait pair in here. Why?
>
> As I said preivously I do not see why the child needs to signal the parent if all the
> parent needs is the child to exist.
Oh sorry, I think I totally get your point now.
I sent the v3 patch. PTAL.
Best regards
Ma
>
> So the child can just wait here for the parent to wake it up.
>
> Or we do not have to use the checkpoints at all, the child can just do pause();
> and parent can kill() it once it's done.
>
> --
> Cyril Hrubis
> chrubis@suse.cz
More information about the ltp
mailing list