[LTP] ltp build broken on Fedora 40?
Chuck Lever III
chuck.lever@oracle.com
Tue Sep 3 15:42:20 CEST 2024
> On Sep 3, 2024, at 3:24 AM, Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz> wrote:
>
> If kdevops supports easily multi machine testing, you can setup two host
> configuration for LTP [3] (by default is network namespaces.
Awesome! I will look into that, because multi-host is how
kdevops workflows handle NFS (except for the pynfs workflow).
Also, I've been adding support for testing pNFS block/iSCSI
layouts to kdevops. Adding that to the ltp workflow will be
good.
>> So, correct, I am using it for upstream NFS testing, but the
>> kdevops workflow I built is supposed to be more generically
>> useful.
>
>> Input is welcome here; the ltp workflow is pretty fresh, so
>> not everything is working 100% smoothly yet. It would be
>> pretty easy to add more test groups if you think a
>> particular test might be valuable for the Linux file system
>> community, for example.
>
> FYI (you probably noticed) LTP itself allows to test on more filesystems (via
> formatting loop device, C API: .all_filesystems = 1 [4], shell API:
> TST_ALL_FILESYSTEMS=1 [5], which is used in NFS tests to test btrfs, ext4, xfs).
Very useful, thank you!
> [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9PYjRYbc-Ms
> [2] https://github.com/rapido-linux/rapido/
> [3] https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/tree/master/testcases/network#two-host-configuration
> [4] https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/blob/master/doc/old/C-Test-API.asciidoc
> [6] https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/blob/master/doc/old/Shell-Test-API.asciidoc
--
Chuck Lever
More information about the ltp
mailing list