[LTP] [PATCH] sigrelse01: Check if signal 34 is available for musl compat
Florian Schmaus
florian.schmaus@codasip.com
Fri Aug 8 18:06:52 CEST 2025
On 08/08/2025 16.04, Petr Vorel wrote:
> Hi Florian,
Hi Petr,
thanks for your review.
>> Do not select signal 34 when the test is run using musl. Signal 34 is
>> used internally by musl as SIGSYNCCALL. Consequently, musl's signal()
>> will return with an error status and errno set to EINVAL when trying
>> to setup a signal handler for signal 34, causing the sigrelse01 test
>> to fail.
>
>> Since musl provides no preprocessor macro, we check for the
>> availability of signal 34 by attempting to setup a signal handler. If
>> signal() returns SIG_ERR with errno set to EINVAL then we assume the
>> signal is unavailable. Knowing signal 34 is available with glibc, we
>> perform this check only if __GLIBC__ is not defined.
>
> ...
>> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/sigrelse/sigrelse01.c
>
>> +#define _GNU_SOURCE
>
> Unfortunately +#define _GNU_SOURCE causes test to hang, at least on glibc.
I don't think it hangs, but takes ages to complete. At least, that is
what I found.
> And I see for musl it is necessary to get sighandler_t.
> Until you fix glibc with _GNU_SOURCE NACK.
I think I can get rid of the _GNU_SOURCE. IIRC it was just needed to use
the sighandler_t type. Without _GNU_SOURCE, declaring the return value
of signal() as void* should also work.
> But on glibc it also brought a warning, which means _GNU_SOURCE really switches
> something on:
>
> sigrelse01.c: In function ‘child’:
> sigrelse01.c:397:33: warning: ‘sighold’ is deprecated: Use the sigprocmask function instead [-Wdeprecated-declarations]
> 397 | if ((rv = sighold(sig)) != 0) {
> | ^~
> In file included from /usr/include/sys/wait.h:36,
> from sigrelse01.c:104:
> /usr/include/signal.h:355:12: note: declared here
> 355 | extern int sighold (int __sig) __THROW
> | ^~~~~~~
> sigrelse01.c:472:25: warning: ‘sigrelse’ is deprecated: Use the sigprocmask function instead [-Wdeprecated-declarations]
> 472 | if ((rv = sigrelse(sig)) != 0) {
> | ^~
> /usr/include/signal.h:359:12: note: declared here
> 359 | extern int sigrelse (int __sig) __THROW
> | ^~~~~~~~
> sigrelse01.c: In function ‘timeout’:
> sigrelse01.c:675:25: warning: unused parameter ‘sig’ [-Wunused-parameter]
> 675 | static void timeout(int sig)
> | ~~~~^~~
>
> Also this is a very old test, which needs cleanup and rewrite to new LTP API
> (e.g. remove old unixes, e.g. VAX and get test more reliable). I suppose
> handling signals with LTP legacy API is broken.
>
>> +
>> #include <sys/types.h>
>> #include <sys/wait.h>
>> #include <errno.h>
>> #include <fcntl.h>
>> #include <signal.h>
>> +#include <stdbool.h>
>
> nit: I would postpone this after conversion this to new LTP API.
> Script already uses legacy definitions
> #define TRUE 1
> #define FALSE 0
> and on a different place happily returns 0 or 1.
> Mixing that with <stdbool.h> makes even more mess.
Agreed.
I am going send a v2 that does not use _GNU_SOURCE nor stdbool.h after
checking that it still fixes musl compat for us while not introducing a
regression on glibc.
- Florian
More information about the ltp
mailing list