[LTP] [PATCH 6.16 000/627] 6.16.1-rc1 review
Greg Kroah-Hartman
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Wed Aug 13 16:53:37 CEST 2025
On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 08:01:51PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> > > 2)
> > >
> > > The following list of LTP syscalls failure noticed on qemu-arm64 with
> > > stable-rc 6.16.1-rc1 with CONFIG_ARM64_64K_PAGES=y build configuration.
> > >
> > > Most failures report ENOSPC (28) or mkswap errors, which may be related
> > > to disk space handling in the 64K page configuration on qemu-arm64.
> > >
> > > The issue is reproducible on multiple runs.
> > >
> > > * qemu-arm64, ltp-syscalls - 64K page size test failures list,
> > >
> > > - fallocate04
> > > - fallocate05
> > > - fdatasync03
> > > - fsync01
> > > - fsync04
> > > - ioctl_fiemap01
> > > - swapoff01
> > > - swapoff02
> > > - swapon01
> > > - swapon02
> > > - swapon03
> > > - sync01
> > > - sync_file_range02
> > > - syncfs01
> > >
> > > Reproducibility:
> > > - 64K config above listed test fails
> > > - 4K config above listed test pass.
> > >
> > > Regression Analysis:
> > > - New regression? yes
> >
> > Regression from 6.16? Or just from 6.15.y?
>
> Based on available data, the issue is not present in v6.16 or v6.15.
>
> Anders, bisected this regression and found,
>
> ext4: correct the reserved credits for extent conversion
> [ Upstream commit 95ad8ee45cdbc321c135a2db895d48b374ef0f87 ]
>
> Report lore link,
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/stable/CA+G9fYtBnCSa2zkaCn-oZKYz8jz5FZj0HS7DjSfMeamq3AXqNg@mail.gmail.com/
Great, and that's also affecting 6.17-rc1 so we are "bug compatible"?
:)
thanks
greg k-h
More information about the ltp
mailing list