[LTP] [PATCH] doc: Add ground rules page
Petr Vorel
pvorel@suse.cz
Tue Dec 9 20:38:04 CET 2025
Hi all,
> Hi!
> > I don't recall if we have it mentioned already, but we also used to say that
> > changes introduced in early kernel -rc builds were low priority for acceptance
> > and we favored behavior that is in a released kernel (or at least in last -rcs).
> Sounds good.
+1. We could also mention runtest/staging
:master:`runtest/staging`, which we use for tests written against -rc kernels.
(So far we had only fanotify23 there, which was of course later migrated to
syscalls.)
> Also we probably need something along the lines:
> Use runtime checks for kernel features
> ======================================
> What is and what isn't supported by kernel is determined by the version
> and configuration of the kernel the systems is currently running on.
> That especially means that any checks done during the compilation cannot
> be used to assume features supported by the kernel the tests end up
> running on. The compile time checks, done by configure script, are only
done by :master:`configure.ac` script, ...
> useful for enabling fallback kernel API definitions when missing, as we
> do in lapi/ directory.
do in :master:`include/lapi/`.
Also about my previous note about referencing TST_CHECKPOINT_WAIT(), I know this
is a high level document, but IMHO linking helps newcomers.
Kind regards,
Petr
More information about the ltp
mailing list