[LTP] [PATCH] ioctl_pidfd02-06: Add CONFIG_USER_NS and CONFIG_PID_NS to needs_kconfigs

[Petr Vorel]

Hi all,

> The flags CLONE_NEWUSER and CLONE_NEWPID require specific namespace support.
> Add CONFIG_USER_NS and CONFIG_PID_NS to needs_kconfigs so these tests return
> TCONF instead of failing.

> Signed-off-by: Terry Tritton <terry.tritton@linaro.org>
> ---
>  testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_pidfd02.c | 5 +++++
>  testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_pidfd03.c | 5 +++++
>  testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_pidfd04.c | 5 +++++
>  testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_pidfd05.c | 5 +++++
>  testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_pidfd06.c | 5 +++++
>  5 files changed, 25 insertions(+)

> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_pidfd02.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_pidfd02.c
> index 7eb60e7fc..6983259e4 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_pidfd02.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_pidfd02.c
> @@ -81,5 +81,10 @@ static struct tst_test test = {
>  		{&info0, .size = sizeof(*info0)},
>  		{&info1, .size = sizeof(*info1)},
>  		{}
> +	},
> +	.needs_kconfigs = (const char *[]) {
> +		"CONFIG_USER_NS",
> +		"CONFIG_PID_NS",

How about to check /proc/self/ns/user and /proc/self/ns/pid as ioctl_ns06.c
does?

    int exists = access("/proc/self/ns/user", F_OK);

    if (exists < 0)
        tst_res(TCONF, "namespace not available");

Long time ago we tried to avoid forcing config. Is it now considered as better?
(maybe more readable?) Or we would keep checking /proc (or /sys) but add a
comment for required functions?

Kind regards,
Petr

> +		NULL